PML-N succeeds in filing no-trust move against Elahi

PA secretariat finally allows party MPAs to enter assembly premises


Rana Yasif April 08, 2022
Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Central President Chaudhry Pervaiz Elahi. PHOTO: FILE

print-news
LAHORE:

PML-N Lawmakers on Thursday submitted a no-trust motion in the Punjab Assembly Secretariat against Speaker Chaudhry Parvez Elahi -- a PML-Q leader and a candidate for the chief minister post -- terming the move as the “last nail in the coffin” of the senior politician’s 40-year-long career.

The secretariat finally allowed PML-N MPAs to enter the assembly premises to submit their motion -- a day after the PTI submitted a no-confidence resolution against its own deputy speaker, Sardar Dost Muhammad Mazari.

Chaudhry Amir Habib, the secretariat’s special secretary, received the motion against Elahi from PML-N MPAs Sami Ullah Khan, Khalil Tahir Sundhu, Pir Ashraf Rasool, Khawaja Salman Rafique, Mirza Javed and Mian Abdur Raoof.

The motion, which carries the signatures of a few PML-N lawmakers, read: “Speaker Parvez Elahi has lost his confidence in majority members of the House. The province’s matters are not being run in accordance with the constitution of Pakistan and Speaker Elahi ruined the democratic traditions of the province by following his vested interests.”

Talking to media, the PML-N lawmakers termed the move as “the last nail in the coffin” of Elahi’s 40-year-long political career.

They added that Elahi’s politics had come to its end and his dream of becoming the Punjab chief minister would never be accomplished.

On Wednesday, the joint opposition had also submitted a no-trust motion against Elahi, but it was not accepted by the assembly secretariat. That no-confidence resolution against the speaker had alleged that he had violated assembly rules and influenced assembly matters despite having no jurisdiction as he was currently contesting for Punjab chief minister slot.

The PTI had submitted a no-trust motion against Deputy Speaker Mazari for withdrawing the order postponing Wednesday’s session to April 16.

After submitting the no-trust motion, the PML-Q claimed that the deputy speaker was no longer eligible to summon the House after the motion had been submitted against him.

The resolution against Mazari contained signatures of the PTI's provincial assembly members and was submitted on the basis of distrust against him.

Mazari had moved the Supreme Court to take notice of the ongoing constitutional crisis in the province, and expressed concern over the lack of cooperation in the assembly secretariat after he had summoned the House.

Talking to the media, Mazari said his staff was also being harassed and pressured, despite him having the powers of the speaker as the current speaker, Chaudhry Pervez Elahi, was now contesting for the chief minister’s position.

"In accordance with law, I can conduct the House despite the no-trust motion that has been moved against me," Mazari said, adding that the election was for the post of the chief minister, not the deputy speaker.

He further said that the assembly secretariat was unlawful in its act of not allowing the lawmakers to enter the House and that people were aware of the perpetrators who did not want the session to be conducted.

On Wednesday, a large contingent of police carrying batons and equipped with shields was deployed outside the building of the assembly. Water cannons and Rescue 1122 vehicles were also present there.

Barbed wire was placed around the boundary of the secretariat. Nobody -- including media personnel – was allowed to enter the assembly premises.

 

COMMENTS (4)

Jesus Raza Washington USA | 2 years ago | Reply PAKISTAN GOVERNMENT AND ITS MILITARY AND ITS INTELLIGENCE SHOULD NEVER ALLOW A CRIMINAL TO BECOME THE PRIME MINISTER OF PAKISTAN AND HIS CRIMINAL SON TO BECOME THE CHIEF MINISTER OF PROVINCE OF PUNJAB IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF PAKISTANS MILITARY AND INTELLIGENCE TO PROTECT PAKISTAN FROM SUCH CRIMINALS IN POWER SO THAT THEY DO NOT COMPROMISE THE NATIONAL SECURITY OF A NUCLEAR POWERED NATION IT IS ALSO THEIR DUTY TO PROTECT PAKISTAN FROM AND ITS PEOPLE S VULNERABILITY FROM SUCH LEADERS WHO SCHEMED AND SCAMMED THEIR WAY TO POWER THRU FOREIGN CONSPIRACY AND OVER THREW AN ELECTED GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN PLEASE SAVE OUR BELOVED COUNTRY OF PAKISTAN
Jesus Raza Washington USA | 2 years ago | Reply Pakistan s Supreme Court is biased and Pro-opposition and Nation has no recourse to Challenge CJP Verdict CJP did not take into account that opposition Opted to skip the NSC Meeting Because opposition Knew what the NSC Meeting was all about and they are now asking for NSC minutes as an excuse Supreme court did not take into account that there was a conspiracy to overthrow an elected GOVT. of PM IK Supreme court failed to hold MNA s selling Vote to Opposition This is against The Law and Violation of Trust of People who elected these MNA s and all Those MNA s were Opposition spies Like Tareen Aleem Liaquat and cabinet Ministers Attorney General and 21 other MNA s who were all traitor Not to Mention PML-Q and PML-P PTI was stabbed in the Back Just as what Brutus did to Cesar in the Roman Senate Oppositions leaders Like Shahbaz and son Humza one wants to be the PM other the Chief Minister of Panjab Both are Criminals and Going in and out of Jails and with Hundreds of Pending Criminal Charges against Them and Their Paid and Bribed Judges News Papers and Pak. Media and these Judges keep Postponing their Court hearings for ever 220 Million Citizens of Pakistan do Not want to see the faces of these Satanic Demons who sucked their Blood Money and Took Billions of Rupees to Overseas banks and now want to get re-elected Constitution of a country is Meaningless if that country will cease to exist Parliaments Speakers Verdict decisions was based on First to save Pakistan and its existence Than exercise and Implement Constitution of Pakistan This CJP Verdict is 100 biased and flawed and Pro-opposition and it s Unacceptable
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ