Muslim groups oppose prayer ban in open space in Indian state

Muslims have been offering prayers on govt-owned land at 37 locations in the country

Anadolu Agency December 14, 2021
Muslims offer Eid al-Adha prayers at the Jama Masjid (Grand Mosque) in the old quarters of Delhi October 6, 2014. Muslims around the world celebrate Eid al-Adha by the sacrificial killing of sheep, goats, cows and camels to commemorate Prophet Abraham's willingness to sacrifice his son Ismail on God's command. PHOTO: REUTERS


Muslim organisations have opposed the decision of the chief minister of the northern state of Haryana to not allow Muslims to offer Friday prayers in open spaces in Gurugram, adjacent to New Delhi.

Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind, India's largest socio-religious Muslim organisation, said offering prayers is a fundamental right of Muslims.

“We do not offer Namaz (prayers) in the open because we like to do so. We are compelled to offer prayers in the open. It is the responsibility of the government to give us the facility to offer prayers at places which had been earmarked earlier by the administration for this purpose,” said Secretary Niaz Farooqui. “And the government is kneeling before those who want to go against the law and forcefully deprive Muslims of their basic right. The government should not bow down to such people.”

The Students Islamic Organisation of India (SIO) Haryana, zonal organiser Asad Ahmad said: “We are utterly dejected by Haryana CM (Chief Minister) Manohar Lal Khattar's remarks. It's unfortunate that the administration is caving in from the pressure by a handful of Hindutva goons who should have been put behind bars for disrupting the prayers and communalizing the society.”

Also read: In Indian cities, Muslim prayers and meaty snacks squeezed out

“The administration is instead punishing law-abiding Muslims, who have always cooperated with the administration and their fellow residents,” Ahmad told Anadolu Agency.

“We demand that until alternate sites are allotted for prayers, the Muslims should be allowed to pray at previously designated sites. The administration should resolve disputes and remove encroachments on various Waqf lands in Gurugram so that the devotees are not forced to offer prayers in public,” he added.

Waqf Board is a statutory body established for the management of movable or immovable properties, including mosques, dedicated for religious, pious or charitable purposes as recognised by Muslim law. But in Haryana most of such properties are heavily encroached.

Khattar in a statement Friday said: “All previous sanctions given for public prayers stand nullified and the state government will now work out an amicable solution that will uphold all rights and ensure no encroachment or exploitation.”

The state is ruled by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

Khattar said prayers would not be offered in public places.

Also read: Hindu group threatens to install idol in Indian mosque

“We have no issues with anybody practicing their religion at their religious places but the use of open spaces is not acceptable,” he said. “We will help the (Haryana) Waqf Board to get their spaces free of encroachment. Till then, people should offer prayers at their legal sites, homes etc. We won’t infringe on any rights but nobody’s allowed to bully.”

Protests by right-wing Hindu groups along with residents have been going on for several weeks.

Muslims had been offering Friday prayers on government-owned land at 37 locations designated by the local administration in Gurugram.

But right-wing groups, along with residents, said Muslims should not be allowed to offer prayers on the land as they may create security problems.

Several rounds of meetings between the administration and residents failed to solve the issue.

Muslims who offer prayers in government-designated land believe only two mosques exist in the area and it is not possible for all to offer prayers in just two mosques.


Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ