Govt to challenge SC order on sacked employees law

Apex court has struck down Sacked Employees (Reinstatement) Ordinance Act, 2010


Hasnaat Malik September 14, 2021
PHOTO: AFP/FILE

ISLAMABAD:

The federal government has decided to challenge the Supreme Court's judgment regarding removal of thousands of employees by striking down Sacked Employees (Reinstatement) Ordinance Act, 2010.

AGP Khalid Jawed Khan will file the review petition in this regard soon.

Talking to The Express Tribune, the AGP confirmed that he received the government instructions regarding filing of the review petition against the apex court ruling.

Earlier, the relevant ministry was reluctant to file the review petition. Even three senior ministers were not in favour of challenging the SC ruling.

Subsequently, when the sacked employees started protesting outside parliament, the government changed its mind.

The AGP Office sources revealed that firstly, the government would seek two weeks from the registrar office to file the review petition. The 30-day deadline regarding filing of review is going to end on September 17.

On appeals against various judgments of the high courts, a three-member bench, comprising Justice Mushir Alam, Justice Qazi Muhammad Amin Ahmed and Justice Aminud Din Khan, directed for stopping all the benefits accrued to the beneficiaries of the act with immediate effect.

“The Act has extended undue advantage to a certain class of citizens thereby violating the fundamental rights under articles 4, 9, and 25 of the employees in the Service of Pakistan and being void under Article 8 of the Constitution,” the judgment, authored by Justice Mushir Alam, said.

READ Protest against judges' elevation uncalled for: CJP

“While the Act of 2010 intends for reinstatement, the jurisprudence of this Court has clearly laid down the nuances entailed by the term ‘reinstatement’. The Act of 2010 does not fulfill the criteria laid down by this Court in numerous cases,” it added.

“Therefore, in light of the discussion above, the Act of 2010 is hereby declared to be ultra vires of the Constitution. The effect of such a declaration is that any/all the benefits accrued to the beneficiaries are to be ceased with immediate effect.”

The court ordered the withdrawal of “lump sum” payments after the reinstatement of dismissed employees.

However, it added that the benefits received by the promoted employees for their positions should not be reversed.

The verdict would not apply to the retired or deceased employees, as per the ruling.

“The Legislature is empowered to declare any service to be service of Pakistan by or under an Act of Majlis-e-Shoora [Parliament]. This constitutional provision nevertheless does not empower the Legislature to declare any person to be in the service of Pakistan, on the basis of legal fiction,” it read.

“The Legislature by using the expression ‘shall be deemed’ has allowed to enjoy the status of civil servant, even to those persons who were excluded from its definition in terms of section 2(I)(b) of the CSA, 1973, which also includes a person, who is a contract employee as interpreted by this Court.”

The court noted that the only cavil to such a proposition is if a vested right was created, however, that could only be generated through a valid enactment.

The induction of these employees had adversely impacted the promotion of employees of the Intelligence Bureau, National Highway Authority, Pakistan Telecommunication Company, Overseas Pakistani Foundation, State Life Insurance Corporation of Pakistan, Civil Aviation Authority, WAPDA and Trading Corporation of Pakistan.

Consequently, employees of these departments were engaged in litigation to seek remedy against violation of their rights.

COMMENTS (6)

Imran Ahmed | 3 years ago | Reply Those with authority misuse it to dishonestly seize ever more benefits at the expense of those from whom all power has been wrested. While the old the sick the unemployed women children have everything snatched away.
Allah Bux kalwar | 3 years ago | Reply Very best and authentic news
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ