Global economic recovery needs green focus

Top officials agree to promote public-private partnerships to battle climate change


Reuters June 01, 2021

SEOUL:

Top officials from 38 countries agreed on Monday that efforts to rebuild economies from the Covid-19 pandemic should be guided by green principles and seek to reduce global greenhouse emissions.

The delegates, who included some heads of government and representatives of the United States, China and other major economies, adopted a declaration at the end of the 2021 Partnering for Green Growth and the Global Goals 2030, or P4G.

The gathering was hosted by South Korea for two days, mostly online amid the coronavirus pandemic. “We reaffirm the fight against Covid-19 leaves important lessons for the global response to the climate crisis and believe that the pandemic should be overcome through green recovery as a progressive strategy,” the declaration said.

Read more: Economy has passed difficult phase, says Imran

The participants, including several international organisations, said they would promote public-private partnerships to battle climate change and support sustainable growth.

The document also said a green recovery may also be a turning point in efforts to achieve the goals of the Paris Climate Accord as well as the Sustainable Development Goals, which were adopted by the United Nations in 2015.

South Korean President Moon Jae-in has proposed a “Green New Deal” aimed at helping his country bounce back from the pandemic while eventually reaching the goal of zero emissions by 2050. Moon said that South Korea will raise its goal for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and create a $5 million fund under the Green New Deal to help speed up developing countries’ transitions to renewable energy.

Published in The Express Tribune, June 1st, 2021.

Like Business on Facebook, follow @TribuneBiz on Twitter to stay informed and join in the conversation.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ