Speaking in Paris on his way to his new job as CIA chief, the most celebrated military leader of his generation said Afghanistan's neighbour wanted to eliminate Al-Qaeda and Taliban militants but was struggling.
"They'll be the first to say that there are limits to how much they can do," said the man who headed the United States' longest-running war for the last year, with less territory controlled by militants today but civilian deaths up.
"They have a lot of short sticks in hornets nests right now and they have to consolidate some of those gains."
Petraeus said Pakistani anti-militant operations have been impressive but they "clearly need further effort to deal with some of the other elements, like the Qaeda network in North Waziristan and the Taliban in Baluchistan".
"This relationship is in a difficult stage," Petraeus said, blaming WikiLeaks revelations, the arrest of CIA agent Raymond Davis as well as the killing by US forces of Al-Qaeda kingpin Osama Bin Laden in Pakistan in May.
He said it was believable that Pakistani intelligence did not know that Bin Laden was hiding out in Abbottabad, home to much of the Pakistani military establishment, when he was killed there.
"It is credible to me that they did not know. We received no intelligence whatsoever to indicate that there was any awareness that he was there."
But while "we see the Bin Laden raid as an extraordinary success, intelligence together with military forces, Pakistan sees it as an affront to their national sovereignty, we've got to work our way through this".
"We know what happens when we walk away from Pakistan and Afghanistan, we've literally seen the movie before, it's called 'Charlie Wilson's War' (about covert US support for anti-Soviet Afghan fighters) and indeed that is not in my view a good option. However difficult the relationship may be it's one we need to continue to work, it's one where we need to recognise what our Pakistani partners have done, they've sacrificed several thousand soldiers and police and their civilians have suffered substantial levels of violence."
Petraeus oversaw a surge of tens of thousands of troops into Afghanistan in a last-ditch bid to reverse a nearly 10-year Taliban insurgency and repeat the success of a similar surge he masterminded in Iraq.
But with Taliban leaders not currently wanting to join the political process in Afghanistan, Petraeus said US and Afghan authorities should work on what he said was militants' creeping dissatisfaction with their commanders.
COMMENTS (7)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Naveed Pakistan didn't have a say in Afghan affairs even when their pet Taliban were in power, the Afghans have always used and disposed of Pakistan, just like the Americans.
The USA has two consistent messages that it uses when talking about Pakistan. 1) Difficult relations but they will try and make it work and 2) they will judge Pakistan based on what it does not what it says. Petraeus is just repeating the official line - nothing new.
@proudpaki........its more than evident.....they have lost the war...they cannot stretch it any further...they know whether Taliban would be willing to be a part of the political process or not, they will be back at the helm of affairs after the Americans are gone. Pakistan will be the only country which would have some say in the state of affairs in Afghanistan. America knows it cannot carry on with the war as its headed for a default itself with the national debt mounting to an unprecedented 15trillion. they will have to find a way to pacify things for making Pakistan a closer and more trustable ally...there's just no other way around it.
I agree with proud paki. Something is cooking.
US expects to do what it was unable to do in Afghanistan spending 100 Billion dollars an year.Pakistan has to watch not to be turned into Kambodia of Viatna war.
Petraeus trying to "reset" CIA-ISI relations with him taking over CIA.
yea, I don't actually buy his humbleness... something is definitely not right here....