A month or two into its rule, the government found itself caught in a balance-of-payments crisis, and needed about $12b to avert a default. Instead of resorting to an IMF bailout package straightaway, the government decided to tackle the situation through “soft” loans from friendly countries. Talks for a $6b deal with the Fund, meanwhile, continued — with Umar lingering an agreement in the hope of a better bargain, inadvertently sending confusing signals to financial markets and the business community. As a result, the stock market tumbled, the rupee started losing its value, and businessmen went into a wait-and-see mode. An agreement with the IMF did come, but not before a change in the government’s economic team that saw Umar replaced by a tried and tested Hafeez Shaikh after eight months in service. A change at the SBP’s helm also came shortly, with Reza Baqir succeeding Tariq Bajwa.
With new men came the new recipe — to restructure the economy. The new team sought to achieve stability no matter how grave the implications of putting brakes to the economic activity. The twin deficit — of current account and budget — was the main challenge. The CA deficit meant that the country was importing more than it was exporting while the budget deficit suggested that the government was spending more money than it was generating. Thus came the fiscal tightening — a cut in the volume of imports to tackle the CA deficit and a cap on spending to tackle the budget deficit. The ensuing economic slowdown — coupled with the rupee depreciation, by about 30%, under a market-determined exchange rate regime; a two-fold increase in the policy rate over a period; and an unprecedented raise in power and gas tariffs and petrol prices — wreaked havoc with the home budgets, amid increasing lay-offs and pay-cuts. To add to that was an unrealistic tax collection target of Rs5.5tr for the ongoing fiscal year — a 40% increase year on year. The government’s fiscal tightening to address macroeconomic imbalances has brought down the GDP growth rate from an 13-year high of 5.8% — achieved in FY2017-18 — to 3.3% at the end of FY2018-19, besides turning inflation into a double-digit demon. Furthermore, structural reforms in various sectors of the economy remain a non-starter, loss-making industrial units and growing circular debt remain persistent worries, and public debts continue to balloon.
Now, midway through the fiscal year, the government says economic stability is achieved and the worst is over — a claim sort of substantiated by a major cut in the CA deficit, raise in the volume of exports and FDI, equilibrium in exchange rate, a bullish bourse, and an improved Moody’s rating outlook — and that it is now in a position to focus on steps to better growth rate. The government has thus conceptualised Rs5.5tr PSDP Plus programme to breathe some life into the economy and lessen the common man’s suffering. The economic challenge, however, continues into the new year.
Published in The Express Tribune, December 27th, 2019.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ