"Firms need to think about how they can facilitate collaboration among families in their use of subscription TV. For example, there is the potential to use technologies such as Alexa to identify areas of value destruction and to intervene – for instance, by detecting when one person regularly talks during a certain programme and setting up a recording, so nothing is missed," said Helen Bruce from Lancaster University. Netflix recently introduced a binge watching contract for couples and families to regulate the way they watch TV together.
The contract offers five rules that binge watch partners have to sign on with Netflix. These include: I won't fall asleep; I won't get distracted by my phone causing the other person to rewind because I missed something; I won't continue watching a show without the other person present; I won't talk whilst the show is on and in the event that I come across a spoiler, I won't share it with the other person.
"From our research, we found families value more than just watching TV together, though the ability to do so and to customise those experiences remains extremely important and a key reason why families continue to spend often significant sums of money each month on TV subscriptions," explained Bruce.
House values can be destroyed where the actions of one family member are detrimental to others. "For instance, a person might disrupt family viewing by talking loudly, delete recorded shows that someone else wanted to watch, or make disparaging comments about another party's tastes in TV shows," the findings showed.
Streaming service providers need to provide resources that are easily integrated into consumers' lives, as well as providing reliability and quality. "They also need to respond to common problems, where patterns of behaviour which cause difficulties and thus, a loss of value are repeated across users,” Bruce concluded.
Have something to add to the story? Share it in the comments below.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ