Shahbaz Bhatti’s murder case: ATC orders release of suspect

Hafiz Nazar freed after police failed to present any evidence against him.


Mudassir Raja June 26, 2011

ISLAMABAD:


An anti-terrorism court on Saturday ordered the release of a suspect held in connection with the murder of former federal minister for minority affairs Shahbaz Bhatti, after the police failed to produce any evidence against him.


Special Judge ATC-II Syed Pervaiz Ali Shah directed the I-9 Industrial Area police to free Hafiz Nazar Muhammad, while denying an extension of physical remand for the suspect.

SHO Sajjad Bukhari submitted before the court a request for the extension of the physical remand for eight more days, after Hafiz Nazar was already interrogated for five days.

Muhammad was arrested on June 19, after he made calls to different persons claiming he knew about the assassins of the former federal minister.

The judge asked the police whether the suspect was nominated in the FIR and if they had managed to obtain any useful information from him.

However, the SHO could not come up with a satisfactory answer, resulting in the court’s direction to set him free.

The investigators had informed the court that Hafiz Nazar was traced through his cell phone after he made several calls to different persons, including minorities MPA Tahir Nazeer Chaudhry claiming he knew of Bhatti’s assassins.

It was on March 2 this year that an unidentified person riding a white Mehran car shot Bhatti dead at I-8 Markaz as he was going to his office after meeting his ailing mother.

Bhatti, the only Christian in the federal cabinet, was killed in Islamabad on March 2 this year by three unidentified gunmen.

The killers left a note stating they had killed Bhatti because he had raised his voice against the blasphemy laws.

Taseer assassination case

Meanwhile on Saturday, defence lawyers in the case of the assassination of former Punjab governor Salman Taseer cross-examined the magistrate who recorded the confessional statement of the self confessed killed Mumtaz Qadri.

Special Judge Anti Pervaiz Ali Shah put of the hearing of the case till July 2, after leading defence lawyer Malik Muhammad Rafiq completed the cross-examiantion of Assistant Commissioner Muhammad Ali Randhawa.

The AC in its statement had said that Qadri, a constable of Punjab’s elite force, had confessed killing former governor for criticising the blasphemy laws.

The defence lawyers, on the other hand, have been claiming that the confessional statement of Qadri was obtained through coercive measures.

The hearing of the case of the murder of Taseer, who was shot dead in Islamabad on January 4 this year, was taken up after over a month.



Published in The Express Tribune, June 26th, 2011.

 

COMMENTS (9)

Mirza | 12 years ago | Reply @M. Uzair Sukhera: You wrote: "Mr. Mirza. Do you have anything to do at all? All posts get your respected analysis. Have you read the analysis or detailed judgments of courts in this issue? Digging up old cases of judiciary to prove your point is not the solution." Have you ever heard about multi-tasking, efficiency or hard work? I have overcome the laziness of my culture and God has helped me to think and express myself fast? Sorry if you have a problem with that, try to complaint to God. I do not appreciate personal comments so please refrain from personal comments. I would greatly appreciate if you correct my mistakes in my posts or if I have lied. It is free media and everybody is entitled to give their opinion. I did not see any actual correction you have pointed out in my posting. I do not want to start anything personal and it is my only posting regarding your personal comments.
Aftab Kenneth Wilson | 12 years ago | Reply It is very difficult to convict any person related to our "Outfits". Rather impossible. Judiciary is only to maim ordinary citizen or lesser powerful. Sham system in our country.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ