Withdrawing from Afghanistan

With US troops withdrawing the onus will shift to Pakistan to do more, with a subsequent increase in drone strikes.


Editorial June 24, 2011
Withdrawing from Afghanistan

After its 10-year adventure in Afghanistan, the US finally seems to be looking for a way out rather than conjuring new ways to get further bogged down in a country that no foreign invader has ever successfully invaded. But US President Barack Obama’s Afghanistan pull-out speech should not be seen as a hasty withdrawal; rather by next year he will have removed only the 33,000 troops that he himself sent to the country as part of his much-hyped ‘surge’.

The president will never admit that much but the surge has failed to the extent that he sees no point in keeping these troops around. The extra soldiers were supposed to help train Afghan police to carry on the fight against the Taliban. Given the fact that the US, too, has now approved negotiations with the Taliban, the surge has not been anything remotely resembling a success.

Even with this initial drawdown, the original Isaf troops who have been bogged down in Afghanistan will remain. And for Pakistan that may be a good thing. If the US decides to wash its hands off Afghanistan altogether, the focus will turn even more heavily on Pakistan. Drone attacks will become even more frequent and, having failed to defeat the Taliban on its own, the US will be even more insistent that Pakistan’s military tackle the Taliban in North Waziristan and elsewhere on its own.

US and Nato troops may still remain in great numbers in Afghanistan but Obama’s announcement is nonetheless a policy shift. And it is one that is likely to make Pakistan and its military continue its double game. With the US likely to be out of the picture soon, the military leadership may feel that Pakistan will need the Taliban as a buffer against India and to secure its interests in Afghanistan more than ever. As predictable as it is that this is what the military will be thinking, it is important to point out that this is a flawed tactic. Empowering the Taliban only leads to greater militancy at home. It is also high time we abandon our obsession with India and realise that peace, not confrontation, is the way ahead.

Published in The Express Tribune, June 25th, 2011.

COMMENTS (4)

Feroz | 13 years ago | Reply I do not think the Pakistani military will continue its double game. That strategy has outlived its utility and cost in terms of citizens life has been steep. Also nobody else is going to fund weapon purchases for the Army. The double games will be played within the Army as individuals affiliated to different militant groups play dangerous games caring not for the high command. Mini mutinies and minor rebellions should be expected as ideological warriors jockey for control over not just policy but try to corner most of the Arms and ammunition too.
SharifL | 13 years ago | Reply Except that he only withdrawing extra forces, he increased after becoming President. Ma be it is a trick to win another election. I liked Jamimma Khan's piece in Independent today. She rightly says.Obama keeps doing this. Sounding marvellous, then, in retrospect, disappointing. After eight long and bloody years of Bush, everyone outside America, especially Muslims, welcomed this voice of reason, sobriety and perhaps even empathy. Scribbled on a bullet-punctured wall in Gaza was "Obama Inshallah!". Even in Pakistan, the only ally of the US, which the US regularly bombs, people came out on the streets – any excuse, admittedly – to celebrate his election victory
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ