Pakistan-Russia trade likely to reach $800m

Trade official says increase has been gradual due to lack of direct banking links


Our Correspondent December 29, 2018
Trade official says increase has been gradual due to lack of direct banking links. PHOTO: FILE

KARACHI: Bilateral trade between Pakistan and Russia improved to $660 million in first 10 months of the ongoing calendar year and it was expected to go up to around $750-$800 million by year-end, revealed Russia Trade Representative Yury Kozlov.

Speaking at a meeting at the Karachi Chamber of Commerce and Industry (KCCI), Kozlov said although there was great potential of boosting the existing trade volume between the two countries, the increase had been gradual mainly due to a lack of direct banking channels.

Pakistan and India have $37b trade potential

“In this regard, the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) and the Central Bank of Russian Federation signed a memorandum of understanding in January 2018. But the progress has been too slow as not much has happened since then, therefore, state banks of both countries will have to act more energetically.”

Kozlov pointed out that Russia was engaged in numerous projects and was cooperating with Pakistan in the construction of the North-South gas pipeline between Karachi and Lahore. It was also engaged in a project at the Jamshoro power plant for the production of 600 megawatts of electricity.

Trade relations: Pakistan can benefit by direct export to Brazil

“Russia has offered assistance for the expansion of Pakistan Steel Mills while Russia’s Gazprom has also expressed interest in financing the Iran-Pakistan gas pipeline project,” he revealed.

The Russian trade representative emphasised that Russian companies were keen to explore opportunities in Pakistan whereas the business and industrial community associated with the Karachi Chamber should look into the possibility of participating in trade exhibitions in Russia.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ