Judge tells Preity Zinta, Ness Wadia to 'let bygones be bygones'

Actor revealed that she was abused, threatened by the Indian businessman


Entertainment Desk October 04, 2018
PHOTO: GULF NEWS

Bollywood actor Preity Zinta and her former love interest, Indian businessman Ness Wadia, have been asked by a court judge to finish off their decade long battle, reported Times Now News.

Chargesheet filed against Ness Wadia in Preity Zinta molestation case

Back in 2005, Zinta and Wadia were madly in love. They even co-owned Indian Premier League (IPL) team, Kings XI Punjab. However, the two have been making rounds of the court for over a decade now.

PHOTO: CRIC TRACKER PHOTO: CRIC TRACKER

Ten years ago, it was reported that Wadia had slapped the Salaam Namaste actor at a party. Rumours stated that their relationship was falling apart due to various reasons. Five years later, it was revealed that the two were no longer together and Zinta had filed a complaint against Wadia.

In an earlier interview with India Today, Zinta said, "It's been a while since we decided to part ways. We still co-own Kings XI Punjab but we are no longer dating. During the course of our relationship, he tried to abuse me and used extremely derogatory language.  He tried to behave in a manner where I was put to shame in front of my colleagues, friends and family."

PHOTO: PROKERALA PHOTO: PROKERALA

The 43-year-old star had accused the businessman of molestation, abuse and threatening her on various occasions by boasting about his political connections.

I stared at her open mouthed: Preity Zinta on meeting Jinnah's daughter Dina Wadia

In recent news, a court judge has asked the two to let bygones be bygones and put an end to the case. Wadia's lawyer had insisted that his client would like to move on. He also stated that Wadia has refused to apologise - an aspect Zinta demanded.

Have something to add to the story? Share in the comments below.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ