Cities face loadshedding for more than 12 hours

Pepco says it has no other option other than loadshedding due to the shortfall of 3000 MW electricity.


Express May 11, 2011
Cities face loadshedding for more than 12 hours

The areas of Lahore, Gujranwala, Faisalabad and Multan remained without electricity for more than 12 hours, while the surrounding towns of these cities faced loadshedding for upto 18 hours.

The Pakistan Electric Power Company (Pvt) Ltd (PEPCO) said that it has no other option but to suspend power supply to fill a gap of 3000 megawatts between supply and demand.

In order to seek an end to power crisis, the Lahore High Court on Tuesday issued notices to the federal government and Water and Power Development Authority (Wapda) Chairman on a petition seeking directions for the federal government to disclose all under-construction projects aimed at ending the power crisis.

Meanwhile, many areas from interior Sindh, Khyber Pakhtoonkhwa and Balochistan also remained out of power for several hours.

Earlier, the Sindh High Court issued notices to the Karachi Electric Supply Company (KESC) and the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) in a petition filed against their failure to restore electricity in different areas in Karachi.

COMMENTS (2)

Ben Davis | 13 years ago | Reply This situation reminds me of the Japanese situation. This summer, the majority of JP's nuclear plants will be offline during months of peak usage. PK and JP are leading the way for modern civilization on the downward slope back to pre-Fossil Fuel Revolutionary days. I hope Pakistan (and every other nation) will have a comfortable descent. Any chance of boosting renewable energy generation/extraction in PK?
Ben Davis | 13 years ago | Reply Does Pakistan Railways operate any purely electric trains? I know they have diesel-electrics, but these are generating electric motive power from onboard diesel generators. Thanks, B
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ