Only people can elect party head, says Salman Akram Raja
Says party head has neither legal role in parliament nor influence on MPs
PHOTO: INP
ISLAMABAD:
PML-N attorney Salman Akram Raja on Wednesday contended before the Supreme Court that “it’s people’s right to elect party head”.
The three-judge bench, headed by Chief Justice of Pakistan Mian Saqib Nisar, resumed the hearing of major political parties’ petitions against the Election Act 2017, which ultimately paved the way for former prime minister Nawaz Sharif to become party head.
The PML-N counsel said, “The party head has no legal and constitutional role in parliament,” adding, “There is a distinction between party head and parliamentary leader because a party head has no influence on a member of parliament.”
Lawyers to fend off challenge to Sharif’s re-election
Regarding Article 63 of the Constitution, which is defection clause, Raja also stated that the party head is just a referring authority who sends the matter related to the disqualification of any member of parliament to the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) for adjudication.
He also expressed the apprehension that when leaders of various parties -- including Husain Shaheed Suhrawardy, Ayub Khuhro, Maulana Bhashani, etc., were disqualified under EBDO in 1959, then their vacuum was filled by other forces.
Meanwhile, the judges asked him whether a ‘looter’ or a drug tycoon can lead a political party.
PML-N not happy with Salman Akram Raja
Raja replied, “There has to be law on it, but still the Constitution is silent and the court cannot import interpretation in this matter,” adding “This is wisdom of parliament.”
Another judge Justice Ijazul Ahsan observed that a “disqualified person cannot” become head of party.
”Can we allow a looter to become party head?”
The chief justice observed that the party head has absolute power, asking whether it will not be against the spirit of the Constitution, if a convicted person becomes party head.
“If someone is convicted for life imprisonment, then will he stay as party head?”
The bench also pointed out that the PML-N’s constitution has given immense power to the party head.
Asghar Khan case short order: Full text
However, Raja stated that the PML-N’s constitution is not yardstick with which to examine Section 203 of the Election Act.
Meanwhile, the bench sought details from the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) about the authority within the PML-N, PTI, PPP that granted Senate tickets to their respective candidates.
The court noted that it is necessary to examine the consequences of giving tickets by the party chief.
The bench also sought parliamentary debate regarding the 14th Constitution Amendment which gives immense power to head of a political part.
The hearing of case is adjourned till today (Thursday).
Meanwhile, the top court, on Wednesday reserved judgment on the case related to determination of time duration of disqualification under Article 62(1)(f) of the Constitution.
The five-judge bench, headed by CJP Mian Saqib Nisar heard multiple lawyers during the hearings.
Attorney General for Pakistan Ashtar Ausaf Ali said, “No duration of disqualification is given in the Constitution.”
He stated that the right forum to determine time duration of disqualification is parliament.
“A declaration under Article 62(1)(f) does not carry a time limit, nor does it prescribe the mechanism for revisiting such a declaration. Therefore, till such time the parliament makes such provisions, the declaration shall continue,” the attorney general added.
PML-N attorney Salman Akram Raja on Wednesday contended before the Supreme Court that “it’s people’s right to elect party head”.
The three-judge bench, headed by Chief Justice of Pakistan Mian Saqib Nisar, resumed the hearing of major political parties’ petitions against the Election Act 2017, which ultimately paved the way for former prime minister Nawaz Sharif to become party head.
The PML-N counsel said, “The party head has no legal and constitutional role in parliament,” adding, “There is a distinction between party head and parliamentary leader because a party head has no influence on a member of parliament.”
Lawyers to fend off challenge to Sharif’s re-election
Regarding Article 63 of the Constitution, which is defection clause, Raja also stated that the party head is just a referring authority who sends the matter related to the disqualification of any member of parliament to the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) for adjudication.
He also expressed the apprehension that when leaders of various parties -- including Husain Shaheed Suhrawardy, Ayub Khuhro, Maulana Bhashani, etc., were disqualified under EBDO in 1959, then their vacuum was filled by other forces.
Meanwhile, the judges asked him whether a ‘looter’ or a drug tycoon can lead a political party.
PML-N not happy with Salman Akram Raja
Raja replied, “There has to be law on it, but still the Constitution is silent and the court cannot import interpretation in this matter,” adding “This is wisdom of parliament.”
Another judge Justice Ijazul Ahsan observed that a “disqualified person cannot” become head of party.
”Can we allow a looter to become party head?”
The chief justice observed that the party head has absolute power, asking whether it will not be against the spirit of the Constitution, if a convicted person becomes party head.
“If someone is convicted for life imprisonment, then will he stay as party head?”
The bench also pointed out that the PML-N’s constitution has given immense power to the party head.
Asghar Khan case short order: Full text
However, Raja stated that the PML-N’s constitution is not yardstick with which to examine Section 203 of the Election Act.
Meanwhile, the bench sought details from the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) about the authority within the PML-N, PTI, PPP that granted Senate tickets to their respective candidates.
The court noted that it is necessary to examine the consequences of giving tickets by the party chief.
The bench also sought parliamentary debate regarding the 14th Constitution Amendment which gives immense power to head of a political part.
The hearing of case is adjourned till today (Thursday).
Meanwhile, the top court, on Wednesday reserved judgment on the case related to determination of time duration of disqualification under Article 62(1)(f) of the Constitution.
The five-judge bench, headed by CJP Mian Saqib Nisar heard multiple lawyers during the hearings.
Attorney General for Pakistan Ashtar Ausaf Ali said, “No duration of disqualification is given in the Constitution.”
He stated that the right forum to determine time duration of disqualification is parliament.
“A declaration under Article 62(1)(f) does not carry a time limit, nor does it prescribe the mechanism for revisiting such a declaration. Therefore, till such time the parliament makes such provisions, the declaration shall continue,” the attorney general added.