Egyptian court sentences 16 over Church raid: sources

The perpetrators were each fined 500 Egyptian pounds


Reuters January 31, 2018
An Egyptian court on Saturday sentenced a lawyer for three years in prison, PHOTO:Reuters/FILE

CAIRO: An Egyptian court on Wednesday gave 15 people one-year suspended jail sentences over a December attack on an unlicensed Coptic Church in a village south of Cairo, judicial sources said.

The perpetrators were each fined 500 Egyptian pounds ($28) on charges of inciting sectarian strife, harming national unity and vandalizing private property. They can appeal.

The Giza misdemeanor court also fined the owner of the building, a Christian man, 360,000 Egyptian pounds ($20,500) for turning his residency into a church without a license.

Egypt sentences ex-President Mursi, 19 others to three years in jail for insulting judiciary

Dozens of Muslims from the village of Kafr al-Waslin attacked the church after Friday prayers on Dec. 22, smashing windows and breaking everything inside.

The Archdiocese of Atfih had applied to legalize the church, which housed worshippers for 15 years after a church building law was passed in 2016.

Christians in Egypt have long complained of discrimination in the majority-Muslim country and have increasingly come under attack in recent years.

Egyptian authorities are also battling a stubborn Islamist insurgency, mostly concentrated in the remote Sinai Peninsula, which has claimed several attacks on Egypt’s large Christian minority.

Last month, an Egyptian court had sentenced a lawyer who said woman wearing ripped jeans should be raped to three years in prison

The sentence against Nabih al-Wahsh was passed in absentia as the lawyer, previously released on bail, did not attend the hearing on Saturday.

Wahsh’s comments during a television programme had provoked outrage and complaints to the state prosecutor, who decided to put him on trial.

 

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ