Reaction to Mukhtaran Mai verdict: Citizen groups outraged

Several organisations gather to discuss strategy on how to respond.


Mahnoor Sherazee April 22, 2011

KARACHI:


The acquittal of five of the six men accused of raping Mukhtaran Mai has been met with “shock and absolute disgust” by a cross-section of civil society groups, which gathered at the Aurat Foundation building on Thursday to discuss a future course of action as a result of the Supreme Court’s verdict.


With just 30 days to file for the review of the decision which some organisations, such as the Aurat Foundation, felt was the best way to go.

However, Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) member Iqbal Haider said a review was not a good option nor did Mukhtaran seem interested in filing for one. Haider suggested that Justice Nasirul Mulk’s statement should have been delivered as the verdict but “the courts are slaves of the laws and mere technicalities.”

Many of the women’s rights organisations felt the need to “do something”. Naeem Sadiq, a social activist, said focus needs to be laid on the “dangerous indications the verdicts point to. There are many Mukhtaran Mai and this decision puts their future at stake as well.” Sadiq said contempt of court in citizen’s voicing their opinions on the verdict should act as a stumbling block.

Member of Citizens for Democracy Mohsin Sayeed said, “We need to directly target the judges. Contempt of court is not greater than contempt of human dignity.” Sayeed suggested mapping out a sustainable protest with clearly defined short-, medium- and long-term strategies and goals. “We must force the judges to review themselves.”

Director for War against rape (WAR) Sarah Zaman agreed. “We need to avoid the headless chicken syndrome where there is a sudden hype but the matter fizzles out just as fast and is more damaging,” she warned.

Zaman said for years they have been hearing snide remarks against Mukhataran. “In fact, women who go to the station to register a rape case are taunted by police officers on duty saying, bara Mukhataran Mai banay ka shauq hai tumhain? (You are really trying to follow in the footsteps of Mukhtaran Mai). The idea in people’s minds is that rape survivors come forward for the celebrity status and to cash in on their situation,” she said.

Meanwhile, the Islamabad-based National Commission on the Status of Women (NCSW) and the Insani Haqooq Ittehad (IHI) – an alliance of human rights organisations that includes Mehergargh, Rozan, Sungi, Bedari, Ethno Media, Pattan and others – expressed deep shock and disappointment at the verdict. Additional reporting by Sumera Khan in Islamabad

Published in The Express Tribune, April 22nd, 2011.

E-Publications

Most Read

COMMENTS (15)

Karim Khan | 10 years ago | Reply Justice gangraped in Supreme Court!
m | 10 years ago | Reply The law only requires 4 witnesses for an adultery case and if you look at it without taking it literally, it just means that if 4 people are witnessing an act that is wrong and not doing anything about it than it just indicates something terribly wrong with the society. secondly, when four people are witnessing this,than this immoral act is being propagated and that's wrong and that is what is being punished. its all very symbolic and the wisdom behind the law is actually in its interpretation.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ