PTI leader tweets Kulsoom Nawaz's 'Iqama'

Former PM Nawaz Sharif's wife is running for NA-120, the seat left vacant after the SC disqualified her husband


News Desk August 13, 2017
The picture tweeted by the PTI leader shows an Iqama belonging to Kulsoom, however, it could not be verified if it was real or fake. PHOTO: Twitter

Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Karachi leader Ali Haider Zaidi shared on Sunday what claimed an iqama (a UAE firm work permit)  belonging to Kulsoom Nawaz, the wife of ousted PM Nawaz Sharif.

He tweeted that "the whole family is involved in money laundering" and attached a picture of what appeared to be Kulsoom's iqama.

However, it could not be verified if the iqama was real or not. The document does appear to have been stamped by an election commission official.



Dubai-based law firm confirms documents showing PM's employment status as 'legal'

Zaidi’s tweet came just a few days after Kulsoom’s nomination papers were filed to contest the forthcoming by-election in NA-120, the seat her husband was forced to vacate last month after the Supreme Court disqualified him for not declaring his iqama in his nomination papers for the 2013 general elections.

The by-election will be held in about 45 days.

Earlier, it was decided that Shehbaz Sharif, Nawaz's brother, will run for the vacant seat. However, the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz later changed its decision believing that he should continue to remain the chief minister of Punjab.

Others in the race for NA-120 include Dr Yasmeen Rashid of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, Hafiz Mian Zubair Kardar of the Pakistan People's Party and advocate Ishtiaq Chaudhary of the Pakistan Awami Tehreek.

COMMENTS (15)

Faisal | 6 years ago | Reply PTI has nothing better to do now. How many PTI members have foreign residencies, we all know.
Mukhtar | 6 years ago | Reply @Yasser: It is not he. it is a she. Please dont change the gender just for an Iqama.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ