Ex-DAG ‘to file FIR’ against Nawaz for 'lying' to parliament

Says Nawaz, children were involved in corruption

Asad Zia July 30, 2017
Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif. PHOTO: REUTERS

PESHAWAR: The former deputy attorney-general has announced registering a first information report (FIR) under Section 22-A against former prime minister Nawaz Sharif for lying before parliament about his assets while filing his nomination papers for the 2013 general elections.

“We are going to lodge an FIR against Nawaz on Monday [tomorrow] at Islamabad’s Secretariat Police Station for lying before parliament regarding his assets revealed in the Panama Papers,” said Muhammad Khurshid Khan while addressing a press conference at the Peshawar Press Club on Saturday.

Nawaz could have faced imprisonment

Appreciating the Supreme Court’s ‘bold’ decision, he said that Nawaz and his children Maryum, Hussain and Hassan were involved in money laundering, corruption and looting the national exchequer with both hands and it was time that they paid for it.

Since 2004, Nawaz had been working as marketing manager in a foreign company FZE Capital, he said, adding that later, he became the chairman of that company and received 10,000 dirhams per month as salary.

He claimed that Nawaz’s total assets were worth Rs250 million before coming into power, and when he became prime minister, his assets multiplied tremendously to Rs2,350 million.

PM Nawaz resigns after SC order to disqualify him

The former deputy attorney-general said that Nawaz had not disclosed all his assets when he applied for the National Assembly seat in 2013 general elections, which was illegal and a crime. He demanded of the government to immediately arrest Nawaz and give him an exemplary punishment.


Asad Malik | 4 years ago | Reply @007: Ironic given the corruption scandal currently plaguing South Korea. No one is above the law and NO ONE should have or does have immunity.
007 | 4 years ago | Reply Parliaments are supreme and have immunity. In countries like Japan, italy, and Korea where there is democracy, politicians go to a level holding each other's throats. This is big conspiracy against Nawaz Sharif. What was the argument for his disqualification and what was the verdict ? Now that this precedent has been set why hasn't 62/63 applied on Imran Khan regarding his offshore company and his child ?
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read