Residents of 354 unsafe buildings in Karachi given eviction notices

SBCA says these buildings are on the verge of collapse, especially during the rain

Our Correspondent June 30, 2017
Karachi loses 35% of its water in leaky pipes; Singapore loses less than 5%; what can we learn from the smart city state that used to import all its water

KARACHI: Soon after the beginning of the monsoon spell in Karachi, the Sindh Building Control Authority (SBCA) issued on Thursday eviction notices to the residents of over 354 unsafe buildings across the city, informing them of the danger of living in those decaying structures during the rain.

According to the SBCA, a total of 354 buildings were declared ‘not liveable’ by its technical committee, which comprises of construction experts and engineers, during an inspection campaign. Of these, around 250 are in the old city area alone. The structures of these buildings have lost their strength to bear the load and can collapse anytime.

After formally approaching the residents of the dangerous buildings with eviction notices, the authority was seeking the help of the district municipal corporations (DMCs) to forcibly evacuate the buildings, SBCA Technical Director Askhar Dawar told The Express Tribune.

"We are employing two methods of getting the buildings vacated. The first is joining hands with the DMCs and the other regards convincing residents to vacate the structures voluntarily because it is for their own good," Dawar explained.

Skies open up as Karachi experiences first monsoon shower

Unfortunately, he lamented, not a single resident was ready to leave the buildings, despite being apprised of its hazardousness in detail. "They have seen the dangers of living in such structures themselves. Most of them have narrowly escaped or survived the mishaps. Still they are adamant to stay."

In the dangerous-declared buildings, a considerable portion is composed of evacuee properties that migrants from India were allotted to live in during Partition. Most of these buildings are situated on MA Jinnah Road and its surrounding areas.

Dawar said the authority was also working on a proposal with the Association of Builders and Developers to demolish these hazardous buildings and construct new structures on their lots and lease them to the residents for a stipulated time period.

"This is still in the pipeline because the residents haven't agreed to this mechanism either. They have apprehensions that they might lose their houses as most of them have obtained these residences illegally," he commented.

Returning revellers clog capital’s highways

Meanwhile, Dawar ruled out the impression that the SBCA only swings into action during emergencies. He clarified that teams specifically tasked with the dangerous buildings issue were active throughout the year but residents never cooperated.

"If things remained the same, the use of power to vacate these buildings will be inevitable. Still, we are first considering other options like arranging substitute residences for the over 1,000 families living in those buildings," he told.

A statement issued by the SBCA reads that an emergency was imposed and dedicated teams to deal with the issue of these buildings were active in three shifts all towns across the city.


ZAHEER | 4 years ago | Reply There are lot of buildings in Saddar Town and specially in Burns Road and interestingly in these dilapidated condition buildings the residents have illegally constructed another floors (flats). The construction of illegal flats on rooftops is still unchecked by the authorities as in some old buildings two floors have been constructed with the help of iron guarders or slabs and beams. Recently two balconies of a building collapsed due to worst condition of the premises but the residents reconstruct these balconies with iron guarders again while the pillars of the same building are in worst condition, which may cause any mishap.
Ali khan | 4 years ago | Reply Another land grab by Sindh government
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read