US strategy in Afghanistan will require more troops: Centcom commander

General Joseph Votel did not give details on the number of troops that would be required


Reuters March 10, 2017
General Joseph Votel did not give details on the number of troops that would be required. PHOTO: AFP/FILE

A new US strategy to break a stalemate in Afghanistan will require additional American troops, the head of the US Central Command said on Thursday.

"I do believe it will involve additional forces to ensure that we can make the advise and assist mission more effective," Army General Joseph Votel said during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing.

Votel said a strategy was still being developed and did not give details on the number of troops that would be required or when a final decision would be made.

With fewer US troops in Afghanistan, pressure grows for more air strikes

Last month, Army General John Nicholson, the top US commander in Afghanistan, said he needed several thousand more international troops in order to break the stalemate in the long war with Taliban insurgents, signalling that the matter may soon be put before President Donald Trump.

So far, Trump has offered little clarity about whether he might approve more forces for Afghanistan, where some 8,400 US troops remain more than 15 years after the Taliban government was toppled by US-backed Afghan forces.

The difficult situation in Afghanistan was highlighted on Wednesday when 49 people were killed following an attack on a military hospital in Kabul by gunmen.

The gunmen went through the 400-bed hospital, shooting doctors, patients and visitors and battling security forces for several hours in a sophisticated operation. Islamic State claimed responsibility for the attack.

COMMENTS (1)

Bunny Rabbit | 7 years ago | Reply Ufff Once Uncle Sam comes , they never leave . its this reason or that ... they will stay on and on and on .. These 'exit strategies ' are just for eye wash .
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ