The morning after the revels there is always a reckoning. Whilst the successful staging of a single cricket match is to be applauded, the fact remains that it could only be staged at a vast cost in terms of security — and the conditions that necessitated that security have not changed one iota. The country as a whole is no less prone and vulnerable to terrorist attack than it was in the days before the match, which is, whether the state likes it or not, a neon-sign example of how badly failed is the National Action Plan (NAP).
If there are to be other matches, an opening up to truly international competititon, then there has to be a broadening and deepening of the safe-security environment such that it does not require a vast army to secure the safety of a single game. Security incidents need to become the exception rather than an expectation.
What the match in Lahore signified was that a push-back is at least possible, however limited, but a pushback is not a developed counter-terror plan or narrative. That can and must be developed if there are to be more nights when the national smile accompanies us all to our beds. For now, a brief bask in some welcome light. Now get on with the heavy lifting.
Published in The Express Tribune, March 7th, 2017.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (1)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ