Assembly proceedings: K-P calls for full ban on porn websites

Calling for a comprehensive ban on porn websites


Our Correspondent January 28, 2017
Assembly proceedings: K-P calls for full ban on porn websites

PESHAWAR: The Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Assembly on Friday passed a resolution, calling for a comprehensive ban on porn websites across the country. Pakistan Peoples Party lawmaker Fakhr Azam Wazir moved a resolution, urging the federal government to direct the Pakistan Telecommunications Authority (PTA) to ban porn websites. The resolution was adopted with a majority vote, but a Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) lawmaker Shaukat Yousufzai voted against the resolution when it was put up for voting by Speaker Asad Qaiser. The house passed another resolution asking the federal government to give representation to all languages spoken in the country in census forms. Moved by Muhammad Ali of Jamaat-e-Islami (JI), the resolution was adopted unanimously. Another resolution was adopted, which asked the federal government to legislate a law for moon sighting, making it applicable on all parts of the province.

Published in The Express Tribune, January 28th, 2017.

COMMENTS (1)

israr | 7 years ago | Reply that will help a lot and the energies will be saved the key is to find alternatives to utilize these energies ... activities need to be arranged which keep youth and frustrated people busy in something they like to do other than going on to these sites..... No one comes out happy watching these websites instead they come out more frustrated and more troubled so there are more than one reasons for them to be banned, theater films are all good however there must be physical activities like hiking, bike riding, thrill theme park kinda activities and tourist trains lastly you might not be able to help 40+ age people however you certainly can help people like 15+ who are not yet corrupt, again the education is must i mean adult education
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ