Business

Remittances rise 20 per cent

Remittances sent home by overseas Pakistanis soar 20 per cent in the first eight months of fiscal year.

Ghazanfar Ali March 11, 2011

KARACHI:

Remittances sent home by overseas Pakistanis soared 20 per cent in the first eight months (July-February) of the current fiscal year, in the wake of a tightening of noose around illegal channels, a stable rupee and contribution of charity money after flood ravages.

Remittances totalled $6.96 billion in July-February 2010-11, compared with $5.79 billion in the corresponding period of the preceding year, according to the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) on Thursday.

In February alone, $845.28 million was sent home by overseas Pakistanis, up 43.5 per cent or $256.25 million, compared with $589.03 million in February 2010.

BMA Capital Head of Equity Research Hamad Aslam said that tightening of rules and a government crackdown on illegal Hundi and Hawala money transfers over the last two to three years have diverted the flow of remittances towards legal channels. “Earlier, around 50 per cent of remittances were coming from illegal channels, but now the figure has come down to around 30 per cent,” he said.

Aslam said that a stable rupee against the dollar in the current fiscal year has also caused an increase in remittances as earlier the overseas Pakistanis were holding back the transfer of money to their relatives back home in anticipation of a depreciation in the value of rupee. “In fact, the rupee has appreciated in the last three months,” he said.

Aslam said the flow of charity money from Pakistanis working abroad for relief and rehabilitation following floods in July-August last year also supported the increase in remittances.

An initiative called Pakistan Remittance Initiative, undertaken by the State Bank, Ministry of Finance and Ministry of Overseas Pakistanis more than a year ago, is also facilitating the flow of remittances through formal channels.

The inflow of remittances in July-February 2010-11 from the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Saudi Arabia, USA, Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries (including Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar and Oman), UK and EU countries amounted to $1.63 billion, $1.56 billion, $1.3 billion, $820.02 million, $770.91 million and $220.24 million respectively.

Remittances from Norway, Switzerland, Australia, Canada, Japan and other countries during the period amounted to $663.73 million.

Published in The Express Tribune, March 11^th, 2011.

COMMENTS (4)

Meekal Ahmed | 13 years ago | Reply How much is being diverted into normal banking channels from the hundi is complete guess-work. No one knows about the depth of the hundi flows. There may well be some diversion but that would be speculative. As for the crack-down, that was in 2008 and probably had a one-off stock adjustment effect. Remitting for post-flood reconstruction makes sense. Also higher remittances to compensate for higher domestic inflation and the soaring cost of food. So do these remittances simply sustain/increase consumption? Is nothing saved and invested? Some one needs to do work on that. Like in other sectors of the economy there is a serious dearth of good solid information. If there is no good information, you cannot make good policies.

John | 13 years ago | Reply Please read the State Bank of Pakistan Monetary Policy report of Jan 2011. Remitances are major economic booster along with domestic exports. KL bill was also an important source of renenue. Without remitances and Aid package the economy was reported to be in trouble by SBP and gave a strong recommendations to the government. One of the most concerning issues to SBP was that the government is borrowing heavily from domestic banks leaving less money for the banks to lend to businesses etc..despite lot of money in circulation. Very little money deposited in banks due to inflation. The SBP advised government to cut it's waste, subsidy, increase tax., and domestic tariffs etc. Essentially what IMF is asking. Reading related stories about MQM position and PPP interest in cutting cotton subsidy, power and fuel subsidy, the next week will be interesting to watch. If the recommendations of SBP and IMF are not implemented despite domestic political pressures against them, not sure how the government will find money for it's domestic programs and operations continuing forward.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS

Replying to X