Coal energy: at what cost?

Published: January 17, 2017
SHARES
Email
The writer heads the independent Centre for Research and Security Studies, Islamabad and is author of Pakistan: Pivot of Hizbut Tahrir’s Global Caliphate

The writer heads the independent Centre for Research and Security Studies, Islamabad and is author of Pakistan: Pivot of Hizbut Tahrir’s Global Caliphate

Minister of Planning and Development Ahsan Iqbal recently informed the parliamentary committee on CPEC that Thar coal would be used for electricity for the next 400 years and that two transmission lines were being installed at Mariari — one to Lahore, and another to Faisalabad, which will be connected to the national grid, benefiting all parts of the country. He also stated that some 11,000 MW of electricity will be added to the national grid by 2018 with the help of the biggest energy investment in the history of Pakistan under CPEC. It will be great news if Pakistan can get rid of power outages in major cities.

But the bad news is that over 8,000 MW of this energy will come from coal — major source of carbon emissions in China itself. What consequences will the coal-fired plants, particularly in central Punjab have, usually enveloped by smog in December? China, which surpassed the US in carbon dioxide emission in 2007 becoming leader in world pollution, is already reeling from the impact of the coal energy. In 2014, for instance, Chinese scientists compared the toxic haze to a “nuclear winter” that “has started slowing down photosynthesis in plants.”

And recently in December 2016, environmental protection officials called on the government to issue red smog alerts for 23 cities in northern China. Beijing officials had already issued a red alert after warnings of a build-up of toxic air pollution during cold weather. An additional nine industrial cities had also been advised to issue the lowest-level orange alert. In fact, images of school children taking exam in an open football stadium enveloped in a dense cloud of noxious pollution, which triggered the smog “red alert” on December 20, went viral on the social media.

Taking cognisance of the choking smog, Chinese officials began taking its environmental problems seriously in the year 2014. They struck a deal with the US to reduce the rate of its carbon emissions by 2030. Statistics from the Chinese National Bureau of Statistics show slight reduction in coal consumption (to 3.7 per cent and 2.9 per cent in 2015 and 2014, respectively). But obviously it has to go a long way because 70 per cent of the China’s electric power comes from burning coal and the consumption is estimated to be nearly as much as rest of the world combined.

The thoughtless rush for coal-fired energy by a politically motivated Pakistani ruling elite is both alarming and questionable. Minister Ahsan Iqbal and other leading lights from Punjab know what havoc the fog and smog play with life in winter. They also know unscrupulous nature of the mighty business cartels behind the energy plants. Those running and approving these cartels — politicians, businessmen and bureaucrats, are least bothered about the environmental hazards of coal energy in a country where bribes cover up violations of law.

Most of these businessmen and their political patrons, with second permanent residences and interests parked in the US, Canada and Europe, seem to ignore the havoc coal energy has played in China. For them the overriding motive of importing mostly second and third generation coal-fired plants appears to be quick hefty windfalls.

And let us not blame China for the cunning attitude of our rulers and businessmen. If we go by what Ahsan Iqbal told the parliamentary committee on January 16, it suggests that Beijing has been sensitive to, and adjusting, the CPEC plans to the demands by K-P and Balochistan. They have been facilitating Pakistani wish list as and when necessary following the discord between Islamabad, Peshawar and Quetta.

Most of Pakistan’s big cities such as Karachi, Faisalabad, Multan, Gujrat, Gujranwala, Peshawar and Quetta are already air-water polluted. With the induction of coal energy, and little hope for adherence to environmental standards, this situation will deteriorate. And responsibility for this disaster in the making will rest on Asif Ali Zardari as well as the Sharif brothers, ably supported by a pliant bureaucracy and avaricious business community.

Published in The Express Tribune, January 18th, 2017.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (3)

  • Tahir
    Jan 18, 2017 - 10:32AM

    @Imtiaz Gul. Pakistan need power immedialty and at cheap rate to sustain growth. Your assumption is that 8000 MW of coal will cause smog in all over punjab and you have made comparsion with china. Please clairfiy how much power does china produces from coal and how many tonns of CO2 it releases in the air, then compare it with 8000 MW, i guess it will be a mere fraction of what china has. Easy to say “The thoughtless rush for coal-fired energy by a politically motivated Pakistani ruling elite is both alarming and questionable”, but but what other sources of cheap electricity can pakistan economy sustain?Recommend

  • Imtiaz gul
    Jan 18, 2017 - 2:41PM

    What an irrational argument in support of an extremely corrupt ruling elite and in a country where business community cheats on standards, avoids and evades taxes, most of import is 80 percent under invoiced, exports are on er invoiced for higher rebates and Bureaucrat /officecials receive monthly stipends from industry and businessmen for ignoring violations.
    Our cities are already choking with industrial and diesel emissions. Response to 35 percent losses – equal to proposes coal energy – is efficiency, honest metering and not coal energy. Recommend

  • Tahir
    Jan 18, 2017 - 4:15PM

    @Imtiaz gul:
    My argument is not in support of anything you mentioned. My concern is simple, Pakistan needs to increase its base capacity for power. Which of the technologies do you recommend pakistan can afford, among large hydro, coal, nautral gas, furnance oil and nuclear? And let me remind most of large scale projects will have envrionmental concerns. After Paris agreement China and India, among the largest emittors of GHG, are not putting a cap on coal right away due effect on economy. India is asking transfer of green and renewable technologies and incentives to reduce use of coal and that too in future, not right away. Then why should Pakistan, which need cheap source of energy? and our requirement is a mere fraction of what bigger economies are emitting. Recommend

Leave Your Reply Below

Your comments may appear in The Express Tribune paper. For this reason we encourage you to provide your city. The Express Tribune does not bear any responsibility for user comments.

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

More in Opinion