Ahmed was talking to reporters at Data Darbar after he offered nawafils there, which he had announced he would offer in thanks once the PPP was ousted from the Punjab government.
He said that Sharif has been deceiving the nation by talking about a revolution, while he himself was living the life of a prince. Sharif, he said, should stop this “drama”.
Ahmed said that the PPP was determined to continue the politics of reconciliation and would not destabilise the Punjab government.
He said that the PPP MPAs in the Punjab would continue urging the provincial government to implement the 19-point agenda. “We will expose the PML-N’s inefficiencies and shortcomings,” he added.
He said that the PPP had still not resigned from the offices because their party leader had directed them not to do so. He said the party leader considered this against the Charter of Democracy (CoD). “We will follow the directions of our party leader as we know they are true to democracy,” he said.
He said that 106 PPP MPAs had complained to him that the chief minister was not paying heed to the problems in their constituencies and was not accepting their requests.
He said that the PPP had decided to record their concerns through a protest and hunger strike. “These are the only options left to us to pressure the Punjab government to eliminate lawlessness from the province,” he said.
Ahmed also said that adhering to the PPP’s politics of reconciliation, the party would always to be open to reconciliation and offering their support to the PML-N.
Ahmed refused to comment on turncoats.
Later, Law Minister Rana Sanaullah, in a handout issued on Monday, said that instead of criticising the Sharifs, Ahmed should highlight the properties of his political leaders located in the UK and the rest of Europe and also the corruption cases against his leadership. The Hajj scandal and Pakistan Steel Mills case would be good to begin with, he added.
Published in The Express Tribune, March 1st, 2011.
COMMENTS (2)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ