Ghairat and other issues

Tell any Pakistani that we are isolated and they react with strategic depth and the nuclear power theory.

Ayesha Tammy Haq February 17, 2011

All news space, electronic and print, all newsmakers be they government, opposition or non-government, and pretty much everyone with a beard, turban or both, is preoccupied with Raymond Davis and the mystery of his visa. It’s a story that started with people drawing parallels with B-grade Hollywood films starring George Segal, but has since been upgraded to a film worthy, at the very least, of Harrison Ford.

So we froth and fume over Davis. Our religious parties rush out on to the streets and our politicians to television talk shows where the street sees them daily in the safety of their homes. All of them, the army, religious parties, rightwing political forces, opposition parties, nationalist parties and, to a lesser extent, the government know the score but cannot bring themselves to saying it like it is.

For six decades, we have systematically destroyed all that is required to build a country and equip its people to live and survive in a world that is globalised and hierarchical. We are so wrapped up in a false sense of self and so self-absorbed that we seem to have little or no understanding of how the world works or how it sees us. This lack of understanding just makes us reactive. Tell any Pakistani that we are isolated and they react with strategic depth and the nuclear power theory. The truth is, forget the US, UK and Europe where visas make life difficult. Just take a look around the neighbourhood. The Indians hate us, the Afghans despise us, the Iranians and Arabs look at us with unveiled contempt, the Chinese, who knows what the Chinese think, they smile a lot and tell us to make friends with our neighbours. Even the Sri Lankans now require us to get a visa. And what’s worse is we don’t even like ourselves. We are constantly pulling each other down and do all we can to ensure that no one succeeds.

What else can we do when we have invested our future, not in our people, not in their education, betterment, advancement or progress but in a nuclear arsenal and military might? A huge standing army does not add up to much other than a land grab and a drain on resources. No education, on the other hand, adds up to a lot. It adds up to a closed mind, to no understanding, to no access to information, no ability to advance oneself, to no control over oneself, to having no choices, to not being able to exercise choices that one should have. An educated mother does not just mean an educated family; it could mean much more, a smaller healthier family which, in turn, means less stress on limited resources. It adds up to buying in to the strategic depth and nuclear arsenal. It adds up to chauvinism of the worst kind and places a pugree on its ugly head. It adds up to a lot of noise and no substance.

Most of all, it adds up to a mindset that is out to destroy Pakistan. When people, particularly young people, ask the question ‘why’, we, as a nation, are not equipped to answer them. Our silence allows space to those who have an answer. And that answer comes with a suicide jacket. It is the only answer they are getting and, as we have seen to our own horror, imbibing.

This is not a problem restricted to segments of society, it appears to be pervasive. We know everything and we know best. Instead of listening, learning, following markets, being relevant and being players we are happiest sitting out, talking loudly, claiming to know everything and asking for aid. We want tariffs changed but won’t change our product range. Did you know that more American men wear boxers but we continue making briefs and just want a bigger quota for our briefs on a lower tariff. Makes absolute sense, after all briefs are nice and tight and will keep a firm grip on the world’s b***s.

Published in The Express Tribune, February 18th, 2011.

Facebook Conversations

COMMENTS (57)

Zahid Hussain | 9 years ago | Reply | Recommend @ Ayesha I admire your approach. Even Islam allows a person to accept money in exchange for an individuals life. So what is wrong if a country does so in the larger interest of its very economic survival. But may I ask you, if the money for which we are advised to sacrifice justice is not meant for those in whose name that money is acquired then, isn't it better to go for justice instead of money? Is it advisable to remain financially dependent even if we have to sacrifice our national security? It is not what Davis did to two persons, it is what he was doing in Pakistan in his official capacity? Does the law of the land or international law allow even a diplomat to do that and get away with it without at least "answering a few important questions?" This is what Pakistan's government and law enforcing agencies are engaged in. The shouting in the street and condemnation of the same in the columns both are wrong. We must remain focused on an action and its overall impact. It is not a matter that concerns bi-lateral economic relations, it is a matter that will expose the real culprits behind the war against terror, extremism and intoleration in Pakistan. You will ultimately find out who is behind the acts of terror in Pakistan: Religious fanatics or a group of unidentified Raymonds active across Pakistan.
Ariel | 9 years ago | Reply | Recommend This indeed was a great hard-hitting article. The comments by Truth Seeker and Peace on Earth are equally commendable. These comments and the article itself represent the silent voices of the minority of Pakistani society.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ

Load Next Story