Pakistan to account for violations in Balochistan: Modi

Accuses Islamabad of fomenting unrest in Indian Occupied Kashmir


Afp August 13, 2016
Indian PM Narendra Modi. PHOTO: AFP

NEW DELHI: Accusing Pakistan of fomenting trouble in Indian-occupied Kashmir (IOK), Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Friday said Pakistan would have to answer for its ‘human rights’ violation in Balochistan and the Pakistani side of the Kashmir.

Narendra Modi calls for end to Kashmir violence

"The root cause of unrest in Kashmir is cross-border terrorism which is being encouraged by our neighbouring country," the Indian premier was quoted by the AFP. Modi also he claimed that there was enough evidence to prove that Islamabad was fuelling unrest in the region.

The IOK has been under a curfew since protests broke out over the killing last month of a popular freedom leader Burhan Wani. The unrest has resulted in the death of over sixty people.

Modi also promised to look into the grievances of those living there after meeting with national political parties to find ways of ending the ongoing violence in the troubled state.

Will engage with Pakistan for peace: Modi

"Since the time terrorism has started in Kashmir... so many sophisticated weapons have been seized by our security forces and so many foreign terrorists gunned down... Pakistan can speak a million lies but the world will not accept these," he said in a statement. (WITH ADDITIONAL INPUT FROM BBC URDU)

Published in The Express Tribune, August 13th, 2016.

COMMENTS (80)

mopu | 8 years ago | Reply @Shahnawaz: And your ex chief justice is asking your PM to prove his innocence on panama leaks !!!
Syed Muhammad Ali | 8 years ago | Reply Modi should first look at the state of affairs in India before speaking out against Pakistan. The situation in Indian states like Jammu & Kashmir,Assam ,Nagaland is no different than the situation in KPK,Balochistan and F.A.T.A.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ