
The CII has now stated that it considers the Hague Convention to be in contravention of religious law and the Constitution. This is because of a clause within the Convention that allows that a child may not be returned if the fundamental freedoms and human rights as laid down by the requested state do not permit such a return. The existence of this clause is meant to protect children from being returned to dangerous or abusive circumstances that they are better off being away from. The CII’s interpretation of this matter and the recommendation not to sign the Convention is the latest in a long line of questionable decisions by this body in recent months. The body’s recommendations are increasingly at odds with the government’s stance and the public opinion. Once again, the question has arisen as to why the CII’s recommendations are sought regarding new legislation and its opinion as an unelected, advisory opinion given undue importance in matters of the state.
Published in The Express Tribune, August 6th, 2016.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ