Solidarity with Kashmir

Kashmir continues to bleed and the Indian forces continue to enjoy the bloodbath.


Mahmood Abbasi February 04, 2011
Solidarity with Kashmir

Kashmir Solidarity Day, which falls today, is commemorated every year to remind all Pakistanis that the issue of Kashmir’s independence is yet to be resolved. It is also designed to remind India to honour its commitments to the people of Jammu and Kashmir, as stipulated by the United Nations Security Council Resolutions and, more importantly, by the Indian leaders themselves. The day is celebrated with zeal, enthusiasm and with a renewed pledge to extend solidarity with the people of Kashmir — a decent, cultured, religious and tolerant people, historically content to live peaceful lives in their own beautiful land, and who never coveted conquest or domination, who never imposed suffering on another people, and who want nothing more than the opportunity to enjoy freedom and dignity, which is the birthright of every human being. Sadly, they have been denied this for decades.

A people’s right to self-determination is an inherent human right. The government of India acknowledged that in a broadcast from New Dehli. On November 2, 1947, the-then Indian prime minister said: “We have declared that the fate of Kashmir is ultimately to be decided by the people. That pledge we have given, and the maharaja has supported it, not only to the people of Kashmir but also to the world. We will not and cannot back out of it.”

But afterwards, the Indian side kept on delaying this on one pretext or the other. One incident in this regard is worth mentioning. In 1960, when Nehru came to Pakistan to sign the Indus Basin Treaty, he was taken to the Murree Hills by President Field Marshal Ayub Khan. While sitting in the scenic lawn of the president’s villa, Ayub pointed towards the Kashmir hills facing Murree and politely suggested to Nehru that it was an opportune time to settle the Kashmir dispute, since both of them were in a position to carry their people along with them. Nehru came out with the startling excuse that anti-Muslim feelings had settled down in India and it was best not to touch this issue, lest the feeling be reignited.

During the last six decades, Pakistan has had to allocate a major chunk of its resource pie to boost defence to prevent the looming threat from India, in large part exacerbated by the wars with it, which, in turn, have been caused mostly because of the lingering Kashmir dispute.

Kashmir continues to bleed and the Indian forces continue to enjoy the bloodbath. The organised crimes and brutalities against all shades of people, irrespective of their age and sex and status, are continuing unabated, especially in 2010. This is precisely why February 5 is so important — it reminds us that we need to continue to support the people of Kashmir to exercise their right to self-determination.

Published in The Express Tribune, February 5th, 2011.

COMMENTS (69)

harkol | 13 years ago | Reply @Zeeshan Pandit
Islam is “flourishing” in India
Islam is indeed flourishing in India! Percentage of Muslims in India has gone up while that of Hindus and Christians came down. Agreed, It is flourishing even more in Pakistan (Hindus are all but wiped out).
tremendous prejudice and hate toward Islam
Proof of the pudding is in the eating. The last instance of significant anti-muslim violence happened in 2002 in Gujarat, and there haven't been any instance of group murders of muslims in 9 years (except of Kashmir). Growth in numbers and relative safety of Indian muslims shows there is no prejudice (leave alone 'tremendous') . Indian Hindu laws have been amended frequently and reformed constantly, Muslim Personal laws however are left untouched as the Muslim law board always vetoes them, catering to fundamentalists. Muslim groups even today make a bigger issue of alimony to the divorced rather than relative lack of education. If objecting to such non-reforms in muslim community is what you call prejudice, then India is prejudiced. We don't want to be a fundamentalist/religion dominated nation - Hindu, Muslim or otherwise.
Abdulaziz Khattak | 13 years ago | Reply @Vinayak: As long as you admit that Hindu fundamentalists exist, it is fine for me.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ