Subsidising oil prices

The government is under enormous strain from its coalition allies.


Editorial February 01, 2011

Despite a virtual cacophony of voices opposing its move, the government has decided to bow to the pressures of political expediency and continue its subsidy on fuel prices. The government is under enormous strain from its coalition allies. It is never easy to raise prices, especially in an already high-inflation environment. Yet the administration must understand that a failure to curb subsidies is likely to lead to an unsustainable widening of the federal budget deficit. In essence, the current policy of the government is a repeat of what the Musharraf administration tried in 2007. The result was a gigantic inter-corporate circular debt, which has crippled the energy sector, and high inflation. Clearly, this policy should not be repeated.

Of course, lest this newspaper be accused of advocating higher petrol prices, it should be clarified, that the subsidy created by the government to keep the price unchanged would necessarily lead to inflationary pressures. This would happen because the subsidy has to be funded by either tax collection or other revenue such as a loan or aid inflow. In Pakistan’s case, the usual route is borrowing from the State Bank, which in other words means printing more money, and that causes inflation. Furthermore, the budget deficit, which is already on its way to being well beyond its IMF-stipulated limit of 4.7 per cent of GDP, could reach as high as seven or eight per cent. The finance minister has recently commented on this, saying that such a high level would be unsustainable for the economy and that cuts in government expenditure would have to be made somewhere. If the oil subsidy is not brought down, then such cuts would have to be made in the public sector development programme and spending on social and human development would suffer.

Published in The Express Tribune, February 2nd, 2011.

COMMENTS (2)

Meekal Ahmed | 13 years ago | Reply Good Editorial. Oil crossed $103/bbl today due to mounting concerns over Egypt. Much of the rise does not reflect fundamentals. There is a speculative bubble building up here as the US Fed's "quantitative easing" floods the globe with cheap liqudity. Yes, I too fear that in the absence of a pass-through the government will resort to the destructive process of cutting development spending further. I think you did not mention that an open-ended subsidy such as ours benefits primarily the rich. There should be full pass-through with income transfers to protect the truly poor and deserving.
JJ | 13 years ago | Reply Good work. Now translate to Urdu and print in other newspapers too
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ