LHC annuls law that allowed Christian couples to only divorce on adultery charges

Court declares Federal Law and Clause Ordinance promulgated by former military ruler in 1981 as null and void


Rana Tanveer May 23, 2016
Court declares Federal Law and Clause Ordinance promulgated by former military ruler in 1981 as null and void. PHOTO: AFP

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) on Monday restored Section 7 of the Christian Divorce Act 1869 earlier omitted through an ordinance promulgated by then military ruler General Ziaul Haq in 1981.

Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah declared Federal Law and Clause Ordinance 1981 as null and void which had omitted Section 7 from the Christian Divorce Act.

LHC seeks assistance on Christian divorce law

With restoration of this section, Christian couples can divorce or file for separation in accordance with British customs and traditions. Previously, as per section 10 of the 1981 ordinance, Christian couples could only file for separation or divorce on one reason which was adultery.

Petitioner’s counsel Sheraz Zaka told the court that after the omission of section 7 of the Act the principles of English Divorce Court had been overshadowed and neglected which placed the entire statute to be administered in an ex-facie and discriminatory manner.

Zaka said in the UK the Matrimonial Causes Act was now interpreted in a liberal manner providing a cushion to both Christian men and women to part ways if their marriage was irretrievably broken down or with mutual consent, but this ground was not available in Pakistan for Christians.

Christian marriages: Judge dismayed over govt failure on divorce law reform

The only ground available was in section 10 of the Act for Christian men to divorce their wives which required a husband to accuse his wife of adultery, the counsel added.

Advocate Zaka argued that since the protection of minorities was one of the norms/salient features of the Constitution of Pakistan, therefore the omission of section 7 of the Divorce Act 1869 through the ordinance should be declared unconstitutional as well as null and void.

COMMENTS (2)

Sonia | 8 years ago | Reply Thank you advocate Zaka, Hina Jillani, Amin and Bishop Malik for the landmark achievement that will ease the burden of many innocents souls.
Parvez | 8 years ago | Reply Well done Justice Shah, at least you have shown some initiative and done what you thought was right.........this should be a lesson for other judges to follow. The blasphemy law was also amended by Zia with the sole intention that it be misused.......and it has to the detriment of both society and religion. Correcting this would be a brave and just thing to do.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ