Monument to Benazir: Plea against use of state funds dismissed

Tax payers’ money should not be spent on memorials.


Express January 26, 2011

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court, on Wednesday, dismissed a petition challenging the construction of Benazir Bhutto’s monument at Liaquat Bagh, Rawalpindi, using state funds. Chief Justice (CJ) Ijaz Ahmed Chaudhry, heading the division bench, observed that the court had no say in who is a national hero or where the money for a monument should come from.

The CJ proceeded to dismiss the petition.

The court said, “We cannot give dictates to the government on such matters.”

Lawyer Feroz Shah Gillani had filed the petition against the construction of the monument alleging that it would cost the national exchequer Rs1 billion.

He said that Bhutto was the leader of Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) and the party should pay from its won funds to build the monument.

He said the tax payers’ money should not be spent on memorials.

He also requested the court to remove the name of politicians from government buildings like the Islanabad International Airport, hospitals, government and semi-government departments and institutions.

Gillani said Bhutto was never recognized as an undisputed leader of the country not attained the status of national hero.

Bhutto, he said, never followed ethical and democratic principles.

He said Bhutto’s two governments had been dismissed on charges of corruption and incompetence.

He said the head of such governments could not be a national hero.

Deputy Attorney General Naveed Inayat Malik submitted a report which said Bhutto embraced martyrdom while struggling for democracy and hence the monument was being built from federal funds. He said Bhutto was a leader of international repute and a national hero.

Published in The Express Tribune, January 27th,  2011.

COMMENTS (1)

amjad | 13 years ago | Reply The court may not give dictate on these matters, only if this monument was being built on a private property by private funds. If this monument is being errected on public land with public money the court should have a say. The word "shaheed' or "martyr" does not mean much when you use them with Bhutto(s). It may offend some, but the realty is both father and daughter consider themselves bigger than life. One dismembered the country the other mismanaged it. That is the truth,
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ