Lal Masjid cleric’s pre-arrest bail extended

The bail was extended till March 7 after he appeared before the court for two criminal cases registered against him

Our Correspondent February 25, 2016
The bail has been extended till March 7.

ISLAMABAD: A district and sessions court on Tuesday granted extension in pre-arrest bail to firebrand cleric Maulana Abdul Aziz in two criminal cases registered against him.

Additional District and Sessions Judge, Raja Asif Mehmood, granted extension in bail till March 7 to the Lal Masjid cleric after he appeared before the court.

Top court rejects Lal Masjid cleric’s plea

The Aabpara Police had registered a case under Section 295-A of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) read with Section 3 and 4 of the Amplifier Act against Aziz and others. Further, a separate case under Section 506 (ii) (punishment for criminal intimidation) of the PPC was also registered.

When the case was taken up, Aziz’s counsel requested the court to grant extension in the bail as well as exemption from personal appearance before the court owing to security concerns.

His counsel said that it was alleged in the FIR, dealing with blasphemy and violation of the Amplifier Act, that two persons— Qari Abdul Rehman Muavia and Maulana Ghulam Mustafa Baloch— convened a Shohada Conference wherein a large number of people gathered.

He added that it was further alleged that both the persons along with 14 other religious persons, including Aziz, delivered hate speeches which hurt the religious sentiments of people from other sect and they used the loudspeaker to spread religious hatred.

Court grants pre-arrest bail to Lal Masjid cleric in two criminal cases

Asad claimed in the petition that Aziz had not attended the meeting nor had he addressed the procession.

Asad assured the court that Aziz can join investigation, if and when required.

Published in The Express Tribune, February 26th,  2016.


TAK | 5 years ago | Reply SOB
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read