Afghan religious scholars issue fatwa against peace talks

Ittehad-e-Ulema-e-Afghanistan term negotiations in presence of foreign forces against 'Islamic injunctions'

Tahir Khan January 31, 2016
A file photo of Afghan Taliban. PHOTO: REUTERS

ISLAMABAD: Afghan religious scholars have issued a fatwa, declaring peace negotiations in the presence of foreign forces is “against Islamic injunctions”.

“Americans want to force the valiant Afghan nation to surrender under the excuse of peace. We hope our Mujahideen will not be deceived through these tactics... and not hold peace talks until even a single invading soldier stays in Afghanistan," the fatwa issued by Ittehad-e-Ulema-e-Afghanistan read. "We wish they would stand by their commitments."

The edict comes at a time when diplomatic efforts by different stakeholders in Afghanistan have been intensified.

Precondition for peace talks: Afghan Taliban want removal from UN blacklist

Senior Afghan, Chinese, Pakistani and the US diplomats are scheduled to meet in Islamabad on February 6 to hold further discussions on a road-map to ask the Taliban to join the peace process.

Taliban political negotiators, speaking at an unofficial meeting in Doha last week, had called for certain steps ahead of the talks that include recognition of their office in Qatar, lifting of sanctions on their leaders and release of their prisoners.

Maulana Mufti Mehmood Zakiri, chief of the council, which gave the ruling, read out the fatwa on phone after presiding a meeting of hundreds of clerics to discuss the issue of Afghan peace process.

Nato will keep about 12,000 troops in Afghanistan until 2016, alliance head Jens Stoltenberg had said last year.

Quadrilateral meeting: Islamabad to identify ‘reconcilable’ Afghan Taliban

"Islam instructs its followers that 'Jihad' is compulsory unless the invaders are expelled from an Islamic country. Peace is forbidden with the invaders and their supporters in such a situation," the decree added.

"Any peace with the Americans in their presence in Afghanistan will not be a peace but will amount to surrender."

It was pointed out in the fatwa that the “invaders are taking responsibility of the peace talks at a time when they are a party to the conflict and in fact their invasion caused the armed conflict.

"Such peace process has no Islamic validity in Islamic Sharia.”

It demanded that "the United States withdraw its forces, accept its defeat publicly, and pay compensation for killing Afghans and destroying their properties. Then an independent Afghanistan will maintain relations with the US.”


Shafiq | 5 years ago | Reply Thus proving that the US's and NATO's Afghan was is and has always been a fool's errand. No meaningful progress has been made, and huge amounts of blood and treasure have been wasted. If the US stays another year or another century, most of the country will remain as it has been and when they leave the rest will rapidly fall under Taliban control.
M. Imran | 5 years ago | Reply At last, there are some sane voices who oppose these shameful surrender in the name of "peace negotiation" which is only a smokescreen. The ultimate aim is the permanent US presence with nine bases and one hundred thousand security contractors (same american troops) and ten thousand forces. The fatwa is short on declaring killing afghan by Taliban and Afghan army as "Haram" and directing both to direct their Guns toward the occupier.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read