China again calls for political solution for Syria

Foreign Minister Wang Yi urges five permanent members of UN to unite and seek opportunity to politically solve crisis


Reuters September 30, 2015
Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi attends a meeting with President Xi Jinping, delegates and five United States governors to discuss clean technology and economic development in Seattle, Washington September 22, 2015. PHOTO: REUTERS

BEIJING: China's foreign minister has repeated a plea for the crisis in Syria to be resolved politically, during a meeting of the permanent members of the UN Security Council, the Xinhua state news agency reported on Wednesday.

Russia and the United States, two other permanent members, agreed on Monday to look for a diplomatic end to the Syrian civil war but clashed over the central question of whether Syrian President Bashar al-Assad should retain power.

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi told the meeting at the United Nations that the five permanent members "should unite and seek the opportunity to politically solve the Syrian crisis as the parties are showing more willingness to do so", Xinhua said.

The convening of a third Geneva peace conference at an appropriate time "should be considered and conditions conducive to the opening of such a conference should be actively created", Wang said, according to the report.

"Progress on the political solution will contribute to greater synergy on anti-terrorism efforts of all sides," he added.

Talks between the various parties in Syria should be encouraged and meditation efforts by UN special envoy Staffan de Mistura should be supported, Wang said.

The report made no mention of what China thought should happen to Assad.

China, a low-key diplomatic player in the Middle East despite its dependence on the region for its oil, has repeatedly called for a political resolution and warned that military action cannot end the crisis.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ