LHC declares surcharges on electricity bills unconstitutional

Court strikes down Section 31 (5) of Nepra Act 1997 under which surcharges were imposed


Rana Tanveer May 29, 2015
Orders NEPRA to formulate mechanism to repay the money to consumers within three months. PHOTO: EXPRESS

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) declared on Friday the imposition of the Equalization Surcharge, Debt Servicing Surcharge, Universal Obligation Fund Surcharge and Neelam Jhelum Surcharge by the federal government unconstitutional and hence illegal.

These surcharges were being collected from the consumers by electricity supplying companies. The court struck down Section 31 (5) of Nepra Act 1997 under which these surcharges were imposed. It also ordered National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (NEPRA) to formulate a mechanism to repay the money to the consumers within three months.

Read: Electricity costs: Tariff surcharges imposed despite Nepra objections

The ruling was passed by a division bench of the LHC, comprising Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah and Justice Ayesha A Malik, while announcing a short order on 270 identical petitions challenging the surcharges.

Advocates Khaleeq-uz-Zaman,Waqas Ahmad Meer and Waseeul Hasnain Naqvi assisted the court in this regard.

The petitioners had challenged Section 31(5) of the Nepra Act, 1997, stating that the power of federal government to levy surcharge is ultra vires and negation of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, as it has been added through the Finance Act, 2008.

However the federal government requested the court to suspend operations for the time being based on the order as it will influence their ongoing negotiations with International Monetary Fund and other financing institutions. It will also affect the federal budget which will be presented on June 05, the government further said.

Read: Budget 2015-16: New tax on rich people’s electricity bills likely

Dismissing the application, LHC said the government has the remedy to approach the Supreme Court and get the application suspended.

COMMENTS (4)

cautious | 8 years ago | Reply The petitioners had challenged Section 31(5) of the Nepra Act, 1997, stating that the power of federal government to levy surcharge is ultra vires . If the Federal govt doesn't have the power to tax ---- who does? The way it works in other Democracies is that the Govt can tax and if the people don't like it they can elect new govt.
Waqar Hassan Butt | 8 years ago | Reply The supreme court should not suspend this order as the surcharge is being collected illegally,hence people must get benefit from this court order
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ