Zahid Hussain’s counter-narrative

Published: December 11, 2010

The writer is a director at the South Asia Free Media Association, Lahore [email protected]

I have always respected Zahid Hussain as a true journalist, getting out and ‘reporting as seen’ in contrast to a sedentary recipient of news at second hand like me. His book The Scorpion’s Tail: The Relentless Rise of Islamic Militants in Pakistan and how it Threatens America (Free Press 2010) has set up a rival narrative to the media-propelled version of what happened at Lal Masjid in 2007 and tells us how appeasement was offered to the rising Taliban warlords in the tribal areas.

General Orakzai in Peshawar prevented Musharraf in 2002 from moving against the militants and their patron al Qaeda, disbelieving America and the ISI but fearing “the large presence of foreigners because action against them would spark a tribal uprising” (p.32). The ethnic rage of the Pashtun all over the world is understandable, but it is difficult to grasp why Punjabi General Safdar Hussain, who succeeded General Orakzai in Peshawar, was moved to sign fake, self-damaging deals with warlords Nek Muhammad and Baitullah Mehsud.

Hatred of America, it appears, was the common cause. General Hussain was blamed for the humiliation of the Pakistan Army as fallout from these peace deals: “His commitment to the alliance with the United States was questionable. A year earlier, when I met him at the ISI headquarters, he predicted excitedly that the American forces were going to be bogged down in Afghanistan. ‘That is what we want,’ he said then. Little did he know that his troops would soon be confronted with their own serious challenge” (p.71).

Musharraf was attacked by the state’s own proxy warriors; yet he could not get his generals to act. Orakzai was actually made governor of the NWFP after retirement! Warlord Hafiz Gul Bahadur of North Waziristan, the first frontman of al Qaeda, had promised to get rid of the ‘foreigners’ he was hosting. Zahid Hussain writes: “But he never delivered on those promises, instead using the accords to create an umbrella of protection for al Qaeda forces” (p.35).

The book notes: “A large number of Pakistani officers also refused to accept that the 9/11 attacks were planned by al Qaeda; they believed it was a ‘Jewish conspiracy’ against Muslims, and many of them considered Osama bin Laden an ‘Islamic warrior’” (p.61).

In 2003, al Qaeda-linked Jaish-e-Mohammad nearly killed Musharraf and in 2004, Nek Muhammad ambushed an army convoy near Wana. When the army went after Nek Muhammad, the Lal Masjid in Islamabad issued a fatwa against Pakistani troops, advising Muslims not to give Islamic burial to the martyred soldiers (p. 71). After that several officers were court-martialled for refusing to fight.

In 2007, Lal Masjid was al Qaeda’s watering hole: “The militant clerics of Islamabad’s Lal Masjid — who were affiliated with al Qaeda and both the Afghan and Pakistani Taliban leadership — were to prove a pivotal turning point in the fate of Musharraf’s rule” (p.105). Lal Masjid snipers shot Lt-Col Haroon Islam, the commander of the special forces, triggering the operation against Lal Masjid (p.111).

One cleric Abdul Rashid had become inspired after an hour-long meeting with Osama bin Laden in Kandahar during which he picked up bin Laden’s glass of water and drank from it, saying “I drank from your glass so that Allah would make me a warrior like you” (p.112). And what happened to the Pakistani commandos who attacked Lal Masjid? Two months later, a suicide bomber killed 22 of the SSG’s officers in a mess, with the help of an insider, Captain Khurram (p.121). Another Major (retd) Haroon Ashiq killed Major-General Ameer Faisal Alvi in Islamabad on al Qaeda’s orders (p.170).

Published in The Express Tribune, December 12th, 2010.

Reader Comments (3)

  • Dec 12, 2010 - 12:37AM

    Its sickening how so many people want us to negotiate and sit tight and support these “brave mujahids” who are fighting America! These people have the blood of Pakistani officers and Jawans on their hands, and we are supposed to listen to them and negotiate with them! Where is the “I love my Pakistan Army” brigade now? Why is it so hard to get popular support against those who have taken the law into their own hands, and have the blood of countless, civilians, officers, jawans, rangers, policeman, levies etc on their hands? Recommend

  • M.Srinath
    Dec 12, 2010 - 11:01PM

    A thought on the title of the book. “… how it threatens America”. Does it raise the stakes for US security? Serves the Pak Army’s cause— to cash in on the heightened American fears!Recommend

  • Feb 9, 2011 - 2:56PM

    Khalid Ahmad hits the nail on the head. But the murder
    Of my brother General Faisal Alvi was more sinister
    Than what is presented by the press.. He was
    About to blow the whistle on the top Pakistani Generals who
    were on the Al-Quaida pay roll. The corruption in the
    GHQ was undermining the operations he was
    Involved in and very soon he discovered why.
    He was more concerned about his men and the casualties in
    The SSG.
    The sad part is that the soft pawing with the terrorists started with General Mussharef and
    continued. The last General Faisal saw to present
    His evidence was Kiyani.
    He wanted to save the reputation of the army, but he had said to the General that if no action was taken by Kiyani he would turn to the press.
    Sadly, he never made it. his execution was a warning to the other
    officers who were with him.
    N. K Naipaul Recommend

More in Opinion