Looming threat

Given Pakistan’s recent history, accepting possibility that IS may aim to make inroads would seem to be a logical one


Editorial February 24, 2015
Unless the gravity and extent of the security concern is accepted and accurately grasped, no deterrence can be planned PHOTO: AFP

The confusion that seems to exist in official circles over the presence of Islamic State in the country is not encouraging. The lack of cohesion on whether or not the extremist force which has seized control of large tracts of territory in Iraq and Syria and declared its own caliphate there complicates the task of keeping it away from our doors. Indeed there is evidence it may already have entered, with an IS commander reportedly arrested in the country a few weeks ago and slogans supporting the group appearing on the walls of major cities.



The Taliban have, of course, already declared support for the fiercely anti-Shia force which has also carried out a series of beheadings and kidnappings. The fact that we face a threat from the IS was spoken of for the first time by the Foreign Office on February 23, when Foreign Secretary Aizaz Ahmad Chaudhry told the Senate Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs in Islamabad that the government was on the alert for this. He said agencies had been asked to keep a watch-out for individuals or groups in contact with the force. Mr Chaudhry however said Pakistan did not plan to join any international coalition against IS. His words, accepting a threat exists, contradict those of Interior Minister Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan who, alongside his ministry, has consistently denied this.

The lack of coordination over the matter is disturbing. Given Pakistan’s recent history, with multiple militant groups operating within it, accepting the possibility that IS may aim to make inroads would seem to be a logical one. Denying the possibility of this of course leaves us exposed to more risk. Unless the gravity and extent of the security concern is accepted and accurately grasped, no deterrence can be planned. We need to speak with a unified voice, not a broken, disjointed one. Efforts must be made at the highest levels to devise a definite policy on the issue, come up with a single stance on what is a grave matter and ensure that we are in a strong position to deal with the problem. This can best be achieved when there is no ambiguity and the required cooperation between departments, so that we can know the true picture.

Published in The Express Tribune, February 25th,  2015.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

 

COMMENTS (3)

Boss | 9 years ago | Reply No matter what the name is, the problem is ideology that encourage killing of innocents on the basis of religion or conflict. we need to change this mindset and take measures to teach harmony and tolerance.
woody | 9 years ago | Reply IS is a very nasty terrorist organization - but their not much different than the Taliban who recently slaughtered 133 children, killed tens of thousands of innocent Pakistanis, have a long history of beheading their captives, and fund themselves through drugs smuggling, extortion, kidnapping etc. . I suspect Pakistan's concern with IS maybe that the World has somehow accepted that it's OK for foreign forces to ignore borders and attack them - drones are bad enough but if IS takes root then you may see fighter bombers and boots on the ground.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ