Misplaced sympathies

Civil society activists in wake of Peshawar massacre are beginning to show some grit in support of their many causes


Editorial January 06, 2015
Some people attacked the members of civil society who had gathered at Liberty Chowk to mark Taseer’s fourth death anniversary in Lahore on January 4. PHOTO:NNI

On January 4, a group of people gathered for a candlelight vigil at Liberty Chowk in Lahore to commemorate the death anniversary of former Punjab governor Salmaan Taseer. It will be recalled that Mr Taseer was murdered by his own security guard, because of his stance on the blasphemy laws. The guard was arrested, tried and sentenced to death and has achieved a darkly iconic status. The peaceful event by members of civil society was interrupted by men wielding batons. Those policemen who were present merely looked on. Video footage of the men committing the attack clearly showed their faces, their identities known, and was quickly circulating on social media.

Despite the fact that the attack had been witnessed by the police, they were reluctant to register a case immediately. Civil society stood its ground, and rightly so, and belatedly on January 5, the Gulberg police filed an FIR against suspected attackers, with 35 men having been taken into custody, including several who were seen to be involved in the attack. There is a report that the majority of the men arrested belong to a banned organisation. There has been a commemorative event for Mr Taseer every year since his death but this is the first time it has been attacked.

While the eventual arrest of the suspected culprits is highly welcome, the initial tardiness of the police indicates where their sympathies lie, and it is most certainly not with those who were holding a peaceful vigil for a man murdered in cold blood. Civil society activists in the wake of the Peshawar massacre are beginning to show some grit and determination in support of their many causes. The protests at the Lal Masjid were similarly treated with some contempt by the police, who only acted to file an FIR when pressed to do so. The FIR in Lahore was only registered after civil society activists took their complaints directly to the police. We hope that the police follow through and that there is an early — and successful — prosecution.

Published in The Express Tribune, January 7th,  2015.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

 

COMMENTS (5)

salman | 9 years ago | Reply

This concept of FIR needs to be updated. An FIR makes sense when a crime has been committed and the victim or other approaches the police to register a case.

But in a scenario, where the police is "watching" a crime taking place in front of them, their job should be to stop the crime and arrest the criminals, not wait for an FIR! We've seen the police fail to do this in model town, Faisalabad and now Lahore.

On one hand, you can't blame the low paid cop...he's afraid of arresting the "wrong" person and getting fired. So we come back to the same issue: police reforms.

Zubair Khan | 9 years ago | Reply

Agreed with Rahul. When whole nation has abdicated its responsibility then why to blame police. Better reform the mind set of masses. Without it nothing will improve. All small acts will remain cosmetic steps.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ