MQM stages protest rally against PTI's call opposing division of Sindh

Administrative units must be established for Pakistan to remain strong: Khushbakht Shujaat


Web Desk September 20, 2014

KARACHI: The Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) staged a rally in Karachi on Saturday to protest against a statement made by a member of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf opposing the formation of new provinces in Sindh. 

PTI leader Nadir Laghari had stated that the party was against the formation of new provinces in Sindh – an act MQM chief Altaf Hussain condemned -- prompting the MQM to stage a walkout in the joint session of Parliament on Friday.

Addressing the rally at Teen Talwar in Karahci on Saturday, MQM MNA Khusbakht Shujaat said, "If you want Pakistan to remain strong, to grow, the establishment of these units must be made.”

"We must make administrative units to strengthen the federation in Pakistan. This is not an alien concept. You will decide what has to happen, the decision is in your hands," she said.

In reference to the local body system, Shujaat questioned the rulers as to why this system was abolished. She then asked her supporters, “Did you not benefit from that system? Did you not get clean water and electricity?”

“You (the rulers) stopped this system because you are against our province,” she said, further stating, “We feel happy when we look at how other provinces are developing, but are saddened to see that our province, Sindh, is not.”

She warned that the crowd at the rally would increase. "We have taken the first step today to make you understand. This step can go much further," she said.

COMMENTS (17)

ovais | 9 years ago | Reply

Khushbakht Shujaat is not an MNA... She is an EX MNA ET try to publish facts pleasssseee

oBSERVER | 9 years ago | Reply

@Saad: YOU MUST BE MENTALLY IMPAIRED.I am sure this is not the fault of anyone. You ask a silly question, you get a silly answer!!!.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ