What the government must also consider is that if its successors do not continue with English as the medium of instruction, thousands of children will be left in the lurch. PHOTO: FILE
The Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (K-P) government’s plan to change the medium of instruction from Urdu to English brings forth the debate on teaching in English versus the national language. When the new academic year begins in April, students of class one across the province will be taught mathematics and science in English. Every year, the medium of instruction will be changed in the next academic level. This way, it will take 10 years (until the medium of instruction is changed in class ten) for this framework to be implemented in its entirety.
At first glance, the step — part of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf ’s six-point education policy — seems unnecessarily ambitious. Education must be contextualised to the needs of the learners and children must not be put in an alien space where they are unable to express their view, and question and analyse content. Inability to effectively communicate may not only cripple creative thinking, but may also hurt an individual’s self-confidence. If children first learn to read and have a deep understanding of subjects in a familiar language, they are likely to understand both English and other subjects better. The focus on learning a particular language as opposed to learning itself may also further encourage an environment of rote learning.
While the provincial government has a training programme on the cards, it remains to be seen if short-term training will be enough to equip teachers to be able to teach in English. Pakistan has a dearth of English teachers, let alone teachers who can teach other subjects well in English. What the government must also consider is that if its successors do not continue with English as the medium of instruction, thousands of children will be left in the lurch. Making education a matter of debate and priority goes to the PTI government’s credit. But what is most needed in K-P, and in rest of the country, is a re-haul of content. And changing the medium of instruction is unlikely to fix that.
Published in The Express Tribune, January 7th, 2014.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (2)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Its not like this is an alien idea. Private schools all across Peshawar like City School and BeaconHouse School have an english medium system in place. And when people graduate from these places, they usually either get high-paying jobs, or a chance to immigrate to foreign countries. Therefore, it is not true when you say " that this is unnecessary and non-useful." Second, IK promised to have ONE education system for private schools as well as public schools. This doesnt mean that the private schools have to be dragged down to the govt schools' level. This means that the standard of education in the public school needs to be increased. And keep in mind, they're slowly and gradually implementing this system as to not burden the students. The teachers will obviously teach in urdu, but instead of saying " do jama do " they'll basically say "two plus two ". I think that is basically it. And mind you author nothing is "unnecessarily ambitious". The sky is the limit for most of us but for people like IK, that too is not true