A trade corridor that links the Chinese city of Kashgar to Gwadar would pass through Gilgit-Baltistan, Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan, and create a second national economic artery to rival the one that currently stretches through Punjab and Sindh, offering some of the poorest parts of the country a link to the world economy and with it a path to prosperity. This is something that should have been done decades ago, and should it happen as planned, we would be delighted.
But while the celebrations continue in Islamabad and Beijing, we are tempted to ask a few questions, particularly of our foreign policy mandarins. What sort of a relationship is it that we seek with China? And what exactly do we think China views us as? We would venture to guess that the two views are vastly different and that our penchant for using absurdly hyperbolic phrases to describe this alliance is unwarranted.
The Chinese view of Pakistan is evident in these agreements that have been signed in this trip: China sees Pakistan primarily as an occasional strategic asset with whom it wishes to cultivate an economic relationship. The trade corridor from Kashgar to Gwadar, for instance, is meant to help connect China’s lesser developed western hinterland to global markets and allow those regions to share in the rest of China’s prosperity. While Beijing is willing to occasionally help Islamabad out, it seems to have a greater desire to have a relationship of economic partnership, not one of dependency.
Pakistan, on the other hand, appears to look upon China as a huge benefactor, which can always be relied upon for financial and technological assistance, even when the need for such assistance arises as the result of poor choices on our part. We seem to think that Beijing will continue to hand out freebies to us, especially on occasions when Washington cuts off the money spigot. The reality may be that like any country, China does what it does for its primary self-interest, and if Pakistan can benefit from that, then there is no better outcome than that.
It is deluded to think that China will keep on handing out goodies in exchange for nothing. Beijing appears to be making it clear, though in a subtle manner, that it will do nothing of the sort, and that it expects Islamabad to pull its own weight. In all the agreements signed this past week, for instance, there is no mention of any significant Chinese financial assistance. The Chinese companies that have signed agreements with Pakistan are all service providers, which are being paid for their work by Pakistani taxpayer money (and heavy bank borrowing by the government of Pakistan). It is not Chinese charity, and to its credit, the Chinese leadership does not pretend that it is.
Pakistan’s view of China appears to be seriously misguided, and as a result, our China policy appears focused primarily on begging for assistance rather than building an economic partnership, which Beijing has made abundantly clear it is more than happy to offer. This is an enormous waste of diplomatic energy and the Foreign Office would do well to consider a serious redrafting of their view of our northeastern neighbour.
It does not make sense to be dependent upon the goodwill of larger countries as a matter of policy. It makes even less sense to do so when none of them appear interested in taking Pakistan on as a ward. Let us hope that our foreign policy will, in the future, accommodate this understanding. Maybe then, we will be able to build a real partnership with China.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 8th, 2013.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (25)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
Present dependency can be converted into partnership by achieving balance in trade through hardship and planning.Please also refer my comments in following article:
http://www.aaj.tv/2013/05/civil-nuclear-help-from-china/
Atheist Chinese government and the land of the pure, what a combination. Wow. Lol
Dear ET,
Frankly a useless article. Who in today's day and age believes that CHINA will give out Billions of dollars for no return. No country doles out money to others for free. China has enough poor people of its own to give money to Pakistan, where the wealthy don't pay taxes.
If ET is correct in pointing out that the citizens of Pakistan believe China will give us grants and handouts, well there is another delusion that we need to break free from.
Provision of Capital to these so called "service providers" by Chinese banks to provide services and make profits should be welcome by a country like Pakistan. If Pakistani banks could provide the capital that is required for these projects why would we look to foreign banks and investors? In the end the asset is created in Pakistan which creates jobs during construction, the resulting infrastructure is for Pakistani citizens use and helps the economy.
The catch here is that the government does not collude with these foreign banks, investors and service providers for unusual profits for them to the detriment of our citizens.
To build a 'real' partnership with China, Pakistan will need to raise its stature more than just a notch or two. Else, it may be forced to mortgage its assets to the Chinese in lieu of some instant, financial benefits from them.
@ Khan Gul and Syed A Gilani It has now become an integral part of our national psyche that sane advice and objective analysis is outrightly rejected as foreign agenda. That is why our political elite be fool us time and again.
Beggars are never chooser. Pakistani ruling elite has just changed the faces not the core policies. Nation can never progress unless it seeks to stand on its feet. An economic expert Mr Siddiqui the other day openly said broaden the tax base and Pakistan can get rid of all the begging from economic powers. But no Pakistani leader wants it. Each come at his/her term to cheat the nation and it is continuing amicably.
@Shoaib Ali: "It also ignores the fact that in this climate of inesurity". The whole world knows who is the monater in the game. Now they are reaping and the world is aloof to it.
i thnk we need to do a quick research at bauxite, iron ore and other metals ore reserves, aluminium smelters planned in western china. western china is closer to gawadar than china traditional ports plus it will save the shipping time drastically.railway link to gawadar or karachi motorway is no charity to pakistan. after 70s, pakistan and china is negotiating at mutual beneficial grounds. ET should be careful on purely theoretical analysis, as i read a reference of similar article in Global Insight, blaming chinese and comparing it with commercial interest of US in pakistan.wht ET didnt mention that in every corner in pakistan most of the large industrial units are installed by chinese technology when no western is willing to send their engineers to pakistan to install cement plants etc.
China has now included Pakistan in the same category as North Korea +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Welcome to the Club.
This editorial could have been much stronger if the author would have compared similarity to what China is doing in Africa and what it intend to do in Pakistan. All projects in Africa are envisioned by, policy developed by, paid by, worked by from a to z by Chinese people, and shipped back to china. There is very little benefit to Joe average African local person. All these projects announced by NS are nothing but permission for transit route for the benefit of China. God forbid If Pakistan offered similar transit route to India to connect to Afghanistan and beyond than India would build road, pipeline and railway connections too. Million dollar question is if things went sour between Pakistan and China will Pakistan be able to nationalize this highway or pipeline or the port etc?
@hasan: Too much paranoia makes one look like a fool. And the amount of paranoia in your comments is the usual chicanery that is reminiscent of our troll neighbours in the east. Not surprisingly, none of it has ever come true. You might want to try your luck on another forum.
"This is an enormous waste of diplomatic energy and the Foreign Office would do well to consider a serious redrafting of their view of our northeastern neighbour." ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ The FO has been so debilitated working undert the shadow of the Army that it has been reduced to a subsidiary of the ISPR. Expecting serious diplomacy from this emaciated bureacracy is like expecting superannuated buffaloes to take one across a minefield.
@khankhan: "why PASHA has never proposed this to Pakistani Govt to bring Huawei or ZTE in Pakistan." +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Do you think that HuaWei or ZTE or any other firm will find it easy to operate under 20 hour loadshedding and Pakistani law and order conditions? Pls think and you will get the answer.
The guiding Chinese position in International relations can be summed up by one of the most famous maxims of Deng, dating back to the years before the Cultural Revolution, states that "It doesn't matter whether a cat is white or black, as long as it catches mice."
Non interference in other countries internal politics is a shrewd business strategy by Chinese rulers . It has relations with some of the worst regimes with human rights abuses, as it does not make good business .
China is a great power but more importantly a great friendly neighbor.
Unlike US, it has never treated us as client state or sponsored military coups, violated our sovereignty and or meddled in our political affairs.
People of Pakistan respect and love China, and no amount of US sponpsored propeganda can lessen our respect for China.
some tunnel visioned guy above says that since its time of insecurity, no one investing, so whatever we get from china we should sell our assets for that. This is precisely the reason these shrewed chinese have chosen to help us now. When we are desperate, when we are broke and are nothing but beggars, they come with their loans and get lurative deals stuck purely on their benefit. Pak is just another liability for the chinese, as is N Korea. Both failed states, desperately need money to survive, and the chinese cleverly takes control of all important assets of this country.
Both India and Pakistan have to learn from Chinese. Chinese since the age of Deng Xiaoping have pursued a singular policy of economic goals. It has laid aside its emotional historical baggage and concentrated on China becoming the manufacturing hub of the world. In world history there has never been a period compared to Chinese age of reconstruction wherein 500 million people were lifted from poverty to middle class Military and International politics by Chinese rulers have become subservient to its economic goals . Chinese relationships with other nations is motivated solely by economic self interest . It looks at third world countries including India as source of cheap raw materials and market for its manufactured cheap products.Only countries which have trade surplus with China are commodity rich countries China will play Pakistan card against India for strategic reasons but its economic interest will be guided solely by huge China-India trade which is overwhelmingly in Chinese favor( $ 17 billion surplus .)
Speaking at the Chinese city of Guangzhou today about the achievement of his six-day tour, Sharif said he "noted with concern" the trade volume of Pakistan with China stood at $ 12 billion compared to India's over $ 66 billion last year. The concern was apparently that China-Pakistan trade volume was low despite the "all weather ties", while Sino-India trade posted higher volumes despite troubled ties. The India-China trade posted over $ 74 billion in 2011 and the two countries set the target of $ 100 billion by 2015.( The Economic Times)
This editorial is yet another example that ET is pushing US agenda in Pakistan. There is a strong probability that this editorial was written by political councilar at US embassy.
Biased editorial which fails to see that current PM is driving the relationship in the right direction- trade and investment. It also ignores the fact that in this climate of inesurity, China is the only country willing to invest or help Pakistan with infrastructure development. So why beat up on them? Why not welcome it? However, editors are too concerned about pleasing their mentors in Washington and New Dehli.
PS: PM didnt ask for any aid that is why there is no mention of aid. Infact he made it clear from the start that visit is aimed at improving trade and investment.
I think China is a best strategic partner for devlopment in all sectors. If the road link will be developed between China and Gawadar, many of the undevloped regions of pakistan will be connected to the main cities of Pakistan.
Industrial zones can be build on this highway. I hope these contracts are in the best interest of the both countries. We can get some tax (money) from them for there exports from Pakistan.
INSHA ALLAH these projects will result in huge developments in Pakistan
This is a good editorial which provides a deep and critical analysis of Pak China agreements.
While making deals China maximizes its gains with a good homework while on our side homework lacks deep, cohesive and research based strategies.
Outside of China, Huawei has the largest R&D center in India has over 20,000 IT employees. I wonder why PASHA has never proposed this to Pakistani Govt to bring Huawei or ZTE in Pakistan.
A cogent and purposeful Editorial +++++++++++++++++++++++++ Well done ET.
"A trade corridor that links the Chinese city of Kashgar to Gwadar" ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ In deference to the flavor of the day may I christen this as the Honey Route (a la the silk route)