The Rohingya Muslims are as genuine an example as it is possible to find of a people without a state. PHOTO: AFP/FILE
The Rohingya Muslims are as genuine an example as it is possible to find of a people without a state. The community has a population of about 800,000 in Burma but has never been welcome there, and a statement last year by Burmese President Thein Sein that all Rohingyas should either be deported or placed in refugee camps sparked a mass exodus. Since the Rohingyas are ethnically Bengali, many chose to seek refuge in Bangladesh, which now has an estimated population of some quarter of a million Rohingyas. There, too, they have found conditions to be less than welcoming. Bangladesh does not appreciate the presence of the Rohingyas, despite their ethnic ties to the country and has been striving to make life as difficult as possible for them in the hope that they will leave.
Bangladesh has resisted pressure from international agencies to provide Rohingyas basic necessities like healthcare and education and has even gone so far as to stop the agencies themselves from helping the migrants. The ostensible justification for this is that if life becomes too comfortable for the Rohingyas, even more refugees will be tempted to come to Bangladesh. This logic is absurd. Refugees are created by unlivable and dangerous conditions at home, not because they will find a life of luxury in their new home. As long as the Burmese government continues to treat the Rohingyas as non-citizens, the refugee problem will persist. This is a reality that Bangladesh is ignoring. It has gone as far as to forcibly send Rohingyas back to Burma, where they face repression and perhaps, even death.
All countries should have a moral obligation to accept refugees who are in danger and to then help them resettle. Bangladesh will always be the first destination of choice for Rohingya Muslims and so to turn them away is equivalent to signing their death warrants. Basic decency says that is not a policy a country should be pursuing and other members of the international community need to make that clear to Bangladesh.
Published in The Express Tribune, January 31st, 2013.
COMMENTS (5)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
It is partly because of the real difficulties they must overcome in order to survive humiliation in our time and partly because of their own innate desire to always do better as humans, to over come new challenges, to self-actualize. Please send to them to Malaysia now, because Malays are very good humans and they are humble and accept human beings as they are!
settle them in baluchistan - that will end all troubles
@gp65 .: They should go to India since Burma was also part of British India and hence they have a right to go to the country created by the British after Mughal Empire was destroyed. Also they should consider going to Bangladesh which is the neighbouring nation of Burma and since the Rohinga people are ethnically same as Bengalis.
Any Jew anywhere in the world can goto Israel and he will be accepted there since Israel was made in the name of religion. Since Pakistan was also made in the name of religion, why do you not accept these Muslims?