Free, fair elections are the only way forward: CJ

Calls local body elections a ‘constitutional obligation’.


Naeem Sahoutara December 24, 2012

KARACHI:


Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry has said holding free and fair elections on updated, error-free electoral rolls is the only way forward for Pakistan.


In his address to the legal fraternity of Sindh and Balochistan at the Supreme Court’s Karachi Registry on Saturday, Chaudhry also described local government elections across the country as a “constitutional obligation” which must be complied with immediately. Sindh has not had them since 2009.

Saying the country was witnessing a defining moment in its history, the chief justice maintained that while the people’s “attraction” to the rule of law and the supremacy of the Constitution was mobilising them in one direction, those clinging to “old structures” were trying their best to slow “this march of history”.

Chaudhry observed that in a democratic set-up, every institution needed to recognise and respect constitutional norms. “The judiciary, executive and legislature, though all-powerful in their respective domains, cannot act beyond their constitutional limits through the abuse of authority.” He noted that the success of a democratic system depended on an independent judiciary, which according to him could not be ensured until all institutions worked within their constitutional frameworks.

Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry

Responding to critics who said the judiciary was interfering in state affairs, the chief justice contended that the judiciary had never tried to assume the role of the executive or legislature. He added, however, that the judiciary had the constitutional mandate to annul any parliamentary act or executive action that transgressed constitutional limits.

“Beyond being an adjudicator in bilateral quarrels and disputes, the role of the judiciary in the democratic government of Pakistan is to keep a check against constitutional transgressions.”

While making it clear that the judiciary’s role is not that of an opposition to the legislature or executive, he asserted that in cases where constitutional norms were violated, it had to respond through judicial review.

“Being the custodian of the Constitution, the judiciary has been equipped with the power of judicial review to check the arbitrary exercise of power by any person or institution.”

Meanwhile, Chaudhry expressed his disappointment with the government’s lack of interest in strengthening the court system. “Under Article 37(D) of the Constitution, the state is obliged to ensure inexpensive and expeditious justice to the people, not as a favour, but as a fundamental right… Even though several months have passed, since we sent the government a formal reference to increase the number of judicial officers, we have not received any positive response.”

He added that while the judiciary received constant complaints that it was not providing quick and inexpensive justice, the number of officers in government departments had been increased manifold compared to that of judicial officers.

Published in The Express Tribune, December 23rd, 2012.

COMMENTS (1)

Islah M | 11 years ago | Reply

Plausible arguments by the Hon CJ. The Supreme Court should act in accordance with the mandate of the constitution and within limits to safeguard the interests of people who have been denied rights and made to live in largely inefficient and corrupt dispensations for years.

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ