Mumbai trial in Pakistan: With confessor gone, fate of accused uncertain
Ajmal Kasab’s execution will further entangle the already slow-moving trial of seven men arrested in Pakistan for their alleged role in the 2008 Mumbai attacks.
In January 2009, the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) registered criminal cases against the seven men, all from banned Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), based on Kasab’s confessional statement.
So far, the prosecution in Pakistan has been unable to determine whether Kasab should be cited as a prosecution witness or a co-accused in the pending trial. In his confessional statement, he had accused Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi, the operational commander of LeT, of planning and executing the Mumbai attacks.
One of the defence counsels, Riaz Ikram Cheema, said that as long as Kasab was alive, there was a possibility for the FIA to get a fresh confessional statement registered in Pakistan or to allow defence lawyers to cross-examine him to determine the authenticity of his statement.
In the absence of Kasab, however, the Indian claims that he was trained and sent by the men arrested in Pakistan would remain doubtful without any independent and fair cross-examination, the lawyer said.
In response to a question, Cheema said all other evidence whatsoever will become irrelevant after Kasab’s death, as the case was registered in Pakistan based on his confessional statement.
The lawyer added, however, that “the Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi bench, in 2010 declared the confessional statement of Kasab recorded in India as inadmissible in Pakistan. The Indian government earlier this year denied cross-examination of Rama Vijay Sawanth, the magistrate who recorded the statement of Kasab.”
An Anti-Terrorism court (ATC) trying Lakhvi, Hammad Amin Sadiq, Shahid Jamil Riaz, Younas Anjum, Jamil Ahmed, Mazhar Iqbal and Abdul Majid had also declared the statements of four Indian officials cited as prosecution witnesses here as unacceptable without cross-examination by the defence lawyers, Advocate Cheema said.
“Kasab’s death will create further problems for the prosecution in Pakistan as they had already been unable to decide his status in the case. The trial court had declined the application of the prosecution to cite Kasab as a co-accused and declare him a proclaimed offender,” Cheema said. Cheema is defending the accused in the case along with Khawaja Haris, the former advocate general of Punjab.
The lawyer added that a criminal revision petition submitted by the prosecution, which aimed to get Kasab declared a proclaimed offender, is pending in the Islamabad High Court (IHC).
Prosecution hopeful
On the other hand, the prosecution is hopeful that no irreparable damage has been done to their case after the execution of Kasab. Negotiations between India and Pakistan are underway to provide opportunities for cross-examination to the defence counsels, said Chaudhry Zulfiqar Ali, Special Public Prosecutor in the case. Under the law, the magistrates who record the confessional statement of an accused can be cross-examined to establish the authenticity of the statement, he said.
Regarding the legal status of Kasab before the Pakistani trial court, the prosecutor said the matter was pending in the IHC and he hoped the prosecution would receive a favourable verdict.
“There is further evidence, which is independent in nature, against the arrested accused other than the confessional statement of Kasab. There is a CD containing the conversation between Pakistani handlers and the terrorists in Mumbai, and a statement of Pakistani officials stating that the arrested men operated LeT training camps in different areas of the country,” Zulfiqar added.
Another member of the prosecution team, however, stated that due to the ‘missing link’ of Kasab, the seven arrested suspects plus 11 others at large could now get the benefit of the doubt.
(WITH ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY OUR CORRESPONDENT IN LAHORE)
Twitter reactions
Razarumi: Ajmal Kasab was just a young brainwashed foot soldier. We have to tackle the ideologies of hatred&jingoistic narratives in the subcontinent
Writer and development professional Raza Rumi
narendramodi: What about Afzal Guru, who attacked Parliament, our temple of democracy, in 2001? That offence predates Kasab’s heinous act by many years
Chief minister of Indian state of Gujarat, Narendra Modi
Published in The Express Tribune, November 22nd, 2012.
COMMENTS (4)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
1725443747-0/Untitled-design-(5)1725443747-0-405x300.webp "article")
1724238420-0/Untitled-design-(3)1724238420-0-165x106.webp "article")
Why are Pakistanis asking about Babri Masjid or Gujarat riots? They are internal matters of India. We are talking of Saeed only because he brainwashed Pakistani innocents and turned them into killers to enter India and kill unarmed men, women and children. Are Hindu temples in Pakistan any less sacred than Babri masjid in India? How many are jailed or hanged for killing, forcibly converting Hindus and for destroying Hindu temples in Pakistan? Why is Hindu population in Pakistan decreasing over the years while Muslim population is increasing in India significantly?
No sympathy with any killer of innocent people.
"narendramodi: What about Afzal Guru, who attacked Parliament, our temple of democracy, in 2001? That offence predates Kasab’s heinous act by many years Chief minister of Indian state of Gujarat, Narendra Modi"
Funniest statement by someone who's turn should have been much earlier than Kasab. How about punishing the mastermind of 2002 Gujrat massacre? How about punishing the killers of the Pakistani passengers of Samjohta Express? How about punishing the culprits of Baberi Mosque demolition?
"narendramodi: What about Afzal Guru, who attacked Parliament, our temple of democracy, in 2001? That offence predates Kasab’s heinous act by many years Chief minister of Indian state of Gujarat, Narendra Modi"
Funniest statement of the year.