Afridi ends Big Bash contract despite clearance

Afridi insists he would rather play in Pakistan's domestic league as he struggles to recapture form.


Afp November 19, 2012

KARACHI: All-rounder Shahid Afridi has ended his contract with Australian Big Bash side Sydney Thunder despite being cleared to play in the Twenty20 league by the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB).

The PCB had earlier refused the former captain, along with star spinner Saeed Ajmal and batsman Umar Akmal, permission to play in the league before reversing its decision on Monday following a request from Australian cricket authorities.

But Afridi insisted he would rather play in Pakistan's domestic league as he struggles to recapture the form that made him one cricket's best all-rounders in limited overs but which has deserted him in recent times.

"I have ended my contract in the Big Bash league, because I want to play in the national event to improve my form and justify my selection in the team," he said.

Earlier PCB spokesman said the three players would be allowed to play in the Big Bash following a request from Cricket Australia that said they had already signed their contracts.

"We will allow these players to go to Australia at the end of our Twenty20 tournament around December 8," Sarwar told AFP, adding that the players will have to return for the national camp for the Indian tour.

Ajmal signed for Adelaide Strikers and Umar Akmal for Sydney Sixers.

Pakistan will play India in two Twenty20 matches and three one-day internationals between December 25 and January 6 - the two countries' first series since 2007.

COMMENTS (16)

Yasir Mehmood | 11 years ago | Reply Afridi was hesitant to take part in big bash league where standard of cricket is higher than pakistani domestic tournament.
Parvez | 11 years ago | Reply

Winning hearts and minds where it matters........................good move for his image, especially at this stage where he is struggling.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ