The withering away of the Asghar Khan case

Published: September 15, 2012

The embarrassing aspect of the case persists even today because the people who allegedly received the bribes are in denial and they are all people the Court would prefer not to cause discomfiture to. PHOTO: AFP/FILE

Since January 2012, a brave Supreme Court has finally started hearing the 16-year-old Asghar Khan case, only to find obfuscation and deception about the functioning of the ISI — Pakistan’s premier intelligence agency that scares the world as well as the unprotected average Pakistani. Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry remarked on September 13 that it was “astonishing that the notification for the establishment of the ISI’s political cell could not be found, while the cell had been active for decades”.

The petition filed by Air Marshal (retd) Asghar Khan sought investigation into the distribution of millions of rupees of public money by the ISI among the anti-PPP politicians to manipulate the 1990 elections against the PPP. Successive apex courts have ducked the question asked in the petition because, simply put, the ISI was too powerful, manned by military personnel reporting to the army chief, although legally answerable to the elected prime minister. The present Supreme Court has accepted the challenge of going into an embarrassing case that has withered on the bough of Pakistan’s legal system because of the dominance of Pakistan’s ‘informal’ centres of power that scuttle the Constitution in a polarised political environment. The earlier courts had put the case on the back-burner. A predecessor of the current chief justice, Justice Syed Sajjad Ali Shah was hearing the case in 1997 when he was shown the door by his fellow judges after a ‘judicial’ mutiny, allegedly manoeuvred by the Nawaz Sharif government.

The embarrassing aspect of the case persists even today because the people who allegedly received the bribes are in denial and they are all people the Court would prefer not to cause discomfiture to. The ISI chief involved, Asad Durrani, has made a clean breast of it once again, putting the bite on an ex-army chief, Aslam Beg, who says he knows nothing about the scam.

Durrani’s list of  ‘beneficiaries’ is as follows: Nawaz Sharif (in rupees) 3.5 million, Lt General Rafaqat 5.6 million, Mir Afzal Khan 10 million, Ghulam Mustafa Jatoi 5 million, Jam Sadiq Ali 5 million, Mohammed Khan Junejo 2.5 million, Pir Pagaro 2 million, Abdul Hafeez Pirzada 3 million, Yusuf Haroon 5 million (he confirmed receiving this for Altaf Hussain of the MQM), Muzaffar Hussain Shah 0.3 million, Abida Hussain 1 million, Humayun Marri 5.4 million, Jamaat-e-Islami Rs5 million; Altaf Hussain Qureshi and Mustafa Sadiq Rs0.5 million; Arbab Ghulam Aftab Rs0.3 million; Pir Noor Mohammad Shah Rs0.3 million; Arbab Faiz Mohammad Rs0.3 million; Arbab Ghulam Habib Rs0.2 million; Ismail Rahu Rs0.2 million; Liaquat Baloch Rs1.5 million; Jam Yusuf Rs0.75 million; Nadir Magsi 1 million, etc.

Banker Yunus Habib, who allegedly created the slush fund for Aslam Beg and the late president Ghulam Ishaq Khan has submitted his own list: Aslam Beg Rs140 million; Jam Sadiq Ali (the then-chief minister of Sindh) Rs70 million; Altaf Hussain (MQM) Rs20 million, Advocate Yousaf Memon (for disbursement to MNA Javed Hashmi and others) Rs50 million; 1992 — Jam Sadiq Ali Rs150 million; 1993 — Liaquat Jatoi Rs1 million; 1993 — chief minister of Sindh, through Imtiaz Sheikh Rs12 million; Afaq Ahmed of the MQM Rs0.5 million; chief minister of Sindh, through Imtiaz Sheikh Rs01 million; Ajmal Khan, a former federal minister Rs1.4 million; Nawaz Sharif, Rs3.5 million; 27/9/93 Nawaz Sharif, former prime minister; Nawaz Sharif and Ittefaq Group of Companies Rs200 million (photocopies of cheques and deposit slips attached); Sardar Farooq Leghari 12/12/93 Rs30 million, 6/1/94 Rs2.0856 million, 19/3/94 Rs1.92 million, etc.

Former ISI chief Hamid Gul has admitted on television that the establishment had always been wary of the PPP coming to power and, therefore, manoeuvred the system to circumvent it. Today, the same sort of scenario is in place. It is going to be tough to get to the end of this trial due to the highly politicised judicial process in the country because of the way political rivals are exploiting the bold impartiality of the Court to settle their scores.

Published in The Express Tribune, September 15th, 2012.

Reader Comments (5)

  • Mirza
    Sep 15, 2012 - 2:06AM

    When the court has the lists and names of the recipients with receipts and confession from the then ISI chief and the banker then what is the problem? This crime was committed in early 1990′s and it is a proven fact that it was to steal the elections from PPP and to help its opponents. Does it matter who started the political wing and when? If there is no notification found then the corrupt would live happily thereafter. The irony is those who are and were corrupt are behaving like angels and call the victim of their corruption PPP as corrupt! All the names mentioned are rightwing leaders who have close relationship with the PCO SC judges and helped their restoration. This case would keep dragging till Asghar Khan passes away. This editorial is neither fair nor balanced. The SC barely making any real progress except the populist politics. None of the culprits have been called who have received money and worked against democracy. It also proves how difficult it is to for the secular parties in Pakistan to win any election.

    Recommend

  • Mirza
    Sep 15, 2012 - 8:28AM

    Sir, every word of my comments has censored?

    Recommend

  • Mirza
    Sep 15, 2012 - 9:57AM

    Sorry for the above comment, thanks for the post. Here is a link that tells the history of Pakistani judiciary.
    http://www.mediamonitors.net/shehlabutt2.html

    Recommend

  • Khalid Pathan
    Sep 15, 2012 - 1:31PM

    The way hidden hand controls Pakistan is evident in this case, however, nothing is going to change. It was a courageous move on the part of the Chief Justice of Supreme court to hear this 16 years old petition but the progress on this case is an indication of its fate. For Pakistan one can say that ” The more things change, the more they remain the same.” Mr. Roedad Khan put it beautifully that “For something to change every other thing has to change.” What cannot be cured must be endured.

    Recommend

  • Indian Catholic
    Sep 15, 2012 - 4:12PM

    @Khalid Pathan: The way hidden hand controls Pakistan is evident in this case.
    .
    Pakistan has too many hidden hands. Which hidden hand are you referring to here?

    Recommend

More in Editorial