Expressing concern: PBA renews opposition to proposed Pemra resolution

Says the authority is trying to restrict media freedom.


News Desk June 01, 2012



The Pakistan Broadcasters Association (PBA) has renewed its objections to the proposed Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority resolution.


According to a PBA press release issued on Thursday, the initial objections to the draft Pemra (Content) Resolutions 2012 were sent on May 25.

PBA expressed concern regarding certain provisions which are perceived as trying to curb media independence in the country.

“Pemra is once again trying to restrict the freedom of the media,” the release stated. It added that these provisions provided Pemra “unbridled powers to act arbitrarily.”

“Most of the clauses in the provisions limit media freedom, while some severely restrict the freedom of expression guaranteed by the Constitution. PBA contends these provisions are illegal and void.”

PBA further maintained that definitions to the terms mentioned in the resolution were vague and “likely to be the basis of contention and controversy in the future.” The release added that Pemra had been advised to provide more concrete definitions for these terms.

The PBA release also pointed out that certain provisions in the resolution were subject to pending court litigation and as such, were sub-judice matters. The association asked Pemra to refrain from making resolutions till the proceedings concluded. Regarding advertisements, PBA suggested Pemra forward issues to the television commercial (TVC) preview and monitoring committee which consists members from both bodies.

Commenting on the code of conduct for electronic media proposed in the resolution, PBA said it had forwarded a self-regulated code of conduct to Pemra and the government which both had failed to implement.

Published in The Express Tribune, June 1st, 2012.

COMMENTS (1)

Antebellum | 11 years ago | Reply

And yet again the ET fails to clearly state what the fuss is all about? What/which clauses are ambiguous and source of controversy in the future? Clearly since ET itself is (probably) part of PBA (a group of businessmen, and not journalists) they have and interest in making the new rules (that we do not know of) controversial.

I say publish the new rules and let the people decide if they are justified or not. I do not trust a news-paper with a clear conflict-of-interest to give me an honest analysis. Let me decide!

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ