- RSS
- Today's Paper
- Subscribe
- beta 2.1
Alerts
Suspension of MNA
Justice should be done across the board, will shed the perception that Ms Ispahani is perhaps being singled out.
The reaction to the suspension of PPP MNA Farahnaz Ispahani’s National Assembly membership by the Supreme Court for holding dual nationality is predictably split along partisan lines. PHOTO: INP/FILE
The reaction to the suspension of PPP MNA Farahnaz Ispahani’s National Assembly membership by the Supreme Court for holding dual nationality is predictably split along partisan lines. Supporters of the PPP are blasting the Supreme Court for once again trying to undermine the government while opponents are stressing the importance of having parliamentarians whose loyalties cannot be called into question. The truth lies somewhere in between. The law clearly states that a person cannot hold dual nationality and serve in parliament so Ms Ispahani’s foreign citizenship — if indeed she holds an American passport — should disqualify her from being an MNA. She will also have to explain why she did not declare her US citizenship to the Election Commission of Pakistan, as she is required to do so.
However, just because this law is in place does not automatically make it a good law. Pakistanis holding dual nationality are allowed to vote. If there is no problem with them voting then no one should have issues with them representing their country in parliament. This law may reflect an ideal of citizenship but it ignores reality. Most Pakistanis who have the opportunity to acquire a second citizenship end up doing so because the citizenship of another country is used by many as an escape route should the country continue to go down its current ruinous path. Rather than punishing parliamentarians for holding a second passport, we should be trying to build a country that people are not eager to run away from.
Then there is the perception that the honourable apex court is, perhaps, showing a keen interest in a case that involves the ruling PPP. Proponents of this view cite the memogate, the NRO and the contempt case. But the Supreme Court has also showed an appetite for taking on sacred cows in the Asghar Khan petition and the missing persons case. The Court can now prove its fairness by taking similar punitive measures against parliamentarians from opposition parties who also hold dual nationality. Justice is only served if it is seen to be done across the board. That could, perhaps, help shed the perception that right now Ms Ispahani is perhaps being singled out.
Published in The Express Tribune, May 27th, 2012.
Read more:
dualnationality
Reader Comments (17)
Editorial Latest Stories
Censor Board blues
The importance of a flourishing cinema culture should not be lost on the authorities.
Unwanted residents
We need to see a dignified exit from the parliamentary lodges rather than the ugliness of a forced eviction.
Drone strike survey
Proportion of respondents who believe drone strikes are never justified rose to 63 percent in 2011.
Eradicating IEDs
Nations need to work together to resolve issues linked to militancy, including the production of IEDs
Changing tack
The parameters of initiating talks with the Taliban must be made clear to the citizens.
Fair polling
ECP must be praised for smoothly conducting re-polling at 43 polling stations of NA-250, Karachi.
Reaching new heights
Samina Baig proved that women of Pakistan are reaching new heights, both literally and metaphorically, every day.
Working together
Agreements reached between the civilian and military leadership are vital to our country in many ways.
Recent Slideshows
More in Editorial
Investigating intelligence failures
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, redistributed or derived from.
Unless otherwise stated, all content is copyrighted © 2013 The Express Tribune News Network.
Technical feedback? [email protected]
Well I think at least on this dual nationality issue we should all be together with the SC. How come a person holding another country’s nationality can represent Pakistani nation in parliament. He/she is bound to defend other country’s interest so how can he/she defend Pakistani interests. I think all dual nationality holders should be thrown out of the parliament immediately with out any further delay. I think we all should think about Pakistan not own political parties. We should remember that Pakistan comes first and then our political parties and leaders.
Recommend
Agreed. Across the board!
Recommend
Flawed logic. The question is of national security. Pakistanis can and do hold dual citizenship but when it comes to decision making in the parliament, dual nationality makes you prone to blackmail by the host nation. So you cannot make independent decisions. This is a very good law and it was put there for a reason.
Recommend
Overseas Pakistanis should also stop sending their hard- earned money to Pakistan. how would you respond to that?
Recommend
So what you are saying is that SC shouldn’t implement a law only because someone doesn’t like it. What you should be doing is telling the lawmakers to do their job and amend or repeal bad laws instead of point out finger at law implementing authority.
Recommend
The SC’s decision regarding the suspension of Mrs. Isphani is not one sided. Remember she is not only a member of the parliament but she is serving as adviser to the President and she is also the wife of Mr. Husain Haqqani (Accused in the Memogate scandal and a former ambassador to US). It is also part of our constitution which the convicted PM boasts all the time to follow.
Though, I agree with the writer that similar action should be taken across the board whoever has
dual nationality and at the same time occupying a seat in the parliament. I’d like to remind the writer that a similar case is going on in the SC against Rehman Malik who is dodging the court with delaying tacticts.
Recommend
@Scorpio: Overseas Pakistanis donot send money to Pakistan by choice; they do it in order to support their families. Similarly, private sector employees who boast about paying taxes have no other option since it is deducted at source.
Please stop taking credit for something you dont do by choice.Recommend
@Scorpio:
Buddy…overseas Pakistani are contributor to economy .. they are not part of law making authority.
Recommend
Selective & why only PPP is targeted? Can anybody answer?
Recommend
Rights for dual nationals need in depth analysis. Should not be dealt with emotionally. Origin roots always remain important to Pakistanis settled abroad. Very well said in the article that conditions at home be improved to attract the competent Pakistanis to come back home.
Similarly if apex court is taking some steps then it should be same for all and no one should be singled out on political affiliations. Hopefully honourable CJ of SC will take note of it.
Recommend
Holding dual nationality is not a crime. There are hundreds of thousands citizens in Pakistan that hold dual nationality. Not only in Pakistan but across the world people hold dual nationalities even the case of UK, Saeeda Warsi and Lord Nazir Ahmed is a clear example. Infact we Pakistanis are suffering from xenophobia therefore we are getting alienated on international political and social landscape. The verdict on Farah Naz Ispahani case is no wonder; it was enough that she is the wife of Hussain Haqqani. By hook or crook court had to target her. After biting dust in memogate scandal courts had to fine at lease some other way to settler its scores. This partiality in delivering justice should be end now.
Recommend
Courts have done a wonderful job by striking membership of Farah Naz Ispahani, at least they had to shift their remorse to somewhere after memo case. After failing to fix Hussain Haqqani in a fabricated case, they found a good target. I want to ask Can the Supreme Court move on to more pressing issues now. Property rights, contractual rights, human rights violations that have engulfed this nation. I get it: PPP is unlikable and an easy prey( through their own fault ), but judicial activism right now is not warranted. How about addressing the more than thousand backlog cases as recommended by the “National Judicial Policy Recommendations” in 2009.
Recommend
If Ms. Ispahani has broken the law – witholding her dual nationality when providing papers to ECP – she should be dealt within the framework of the constitution. Having said that, it should also be acknowledged that the issue of dual nationals being barred from Parliament was introduced by the PPP in the 1973 Constitution (Art. 63 (c)). In order to remove this clause, we require a constitutional amendment. Until then, all Parliamentarians who have a dual nationality should either resign from there seat or forfeit foreign passports.
Recommend
Those who see this decision from SC on dual nationality as biased or single sided are basically partisan, no one can support the argument of dual nationality merely on the basis of right.
Recommend
I don’t live in Pakistan and am not a Patistani, but I do live where it is supposed to be a Citizen only country for President. I would think that rather than having some one that has decided that they have to have an escape route planned to a foriegn country would be a bad choice for any member of your government… We have a history of people giving their life and monies to make America FREE. That Freedom is being hacked apart by people that drag their beliefs alone in their baggage, attempting to be what they were in their home country, rather than embrace our concept of Freedom. We have Muslims that believe that Sharia Law would be better for us, in the 236 years we have been around, we have never stoned a woman to death. Although various legal methods of dealing with certain classes of people (murderers) has used a death penalty, from hanging to drugs, we have NEVER beheaded anyone, or hung them burning from bridges as in Iraq. Life is sacred to us and fighting for our Freedom is also.. I pray that you decide to have the portion of your Government not allow DUAL citizenship, including VOTING. People have to decide WHO they are not where they were from…Recommend
Dual Nationality people are mostly honest, sincere people and they Love Pakistan More. They are Thousand Times Better than our corrupt politicians who have single Nationality! !!.Dual nationality people will serve Pakistan in an honest and better way than those having Pakistani nationality, who only wants to loot and plunder Pakistan left, right and center. These people (Dual Nationality) have already been screened out by the western countries of their character/honesty. And do not forget this just because of foreign remittances which largely help Pakistan to meet its expanses. There is no constitutional provision and this is not a crime but Judiciary just want to punish PPP members.Recommend
I live and earn in North America and send lots of $$ home, even while our rupee is going down the toilet (it was 94.5r PKR/USD in the morning). We overseas Pakistanis are the ones who keep the Pakistani foreign exchange coffer filled, I am sure Imam khan doesn’t travel to UK on tourist visa, can PTI prove that I am wrong? Lets get real if we kick out all those who have resident permit or citizenship of foreign country (IMO they are same because the person has a ‘get out of Pakistan’ option open, and please, don’t bring oath for loyalty and other such follies), then we will have to elect all the mullahs because nobody besides us wants them anywhere!
Recommend