Alerts
 
< >

‘Govt must not restore NATO supply routes’

Published: May 15, 2012

Shah Mehmood Qureshi warns of nationwide protests against the govt. PHOTO: EXPRESS/FILE

LAHORE: Shah Mahmood Qureshi on Monday warned the government against re-opening Nato supply routes to Afghanistan.

The Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf vice chairman was talking to reporters at the party’s media office, a week before the Defence Committee of the Cabinet (DCC) meets to take a decision.

Qureshi said if the government decided to re-open the supply routes, the PTI would organise a rally in Rawalpindi on May 27 to “kick off a nation-wide protest against the rulers”. The PTI, he said, was also thinking of holding an all parties conference to take a stand against the government.

During the parliamentary debate on the Nato supply lines, the Parliamentary Committee on National Security had recommended some conditions for re-opening the supply routes, said Qureshi. They included an apology from the US for the Salala incident and halting drone attacks, he said, adding “Can the DCC overrule the parliament?”

The former foreign minister criticised the government for a U-turn in its policies. The foreign minister said that if we do not open the supply routes, it would create problems for Pakistan, said Qureshi. The PTI vice chairman also mentioned the finance minister’s statement, while in Washington DC, that Pakistan would not be able to make the budget if the Coalition Support Fund was not released. “Could the government not foresee these problems earlier?” he remarked.

He then said that the minister for defence had said that Pakistan would be violating international conventions if it did not open the supply routes. “Were these conventions not in place when we closed them?” asked Qureshi.

Published in The Express Tribune, May 15th, 2012.

on Twitter, become a fan on Facebook

Reader Comments (51)

  • feroze
    May 15, 2012 - 9:59AM

    Every one likes to take a defiant stand when not in power. Please get relected then comment on what the governemnt should or should not do.

    Recommend

  • Mirza
    May 15, 2012 - 10:01AM

    This man has no credibility. He would turn PTI into PML-N and keep it out of the parliament. Like Nawaz Sharif he is making all the noises without being in the parliament and yet both of them are “true democrats”. It is easy to raise any slogan but who is going to feed the poor Pakistanis? Who is going to declare war on the US? Who is going to face UN sanctions against Pakistan? What other practical options does Pakistan have?

    Recommend

  • Logic Europe
    May 15, 2012 - 10:08AM

    if he had not been sacked, he would still be foreign minister following the policy of the government

    Recommend

  • Noor
    May 15, 2012 - 10:08AM

    This govt is American Puppet and will open Nato supply.in my view america suffered lot due to this blockage.blockage should be continue

    Recommend

  • Syed
    May 15, 2012 - 10:09AM

    how does shah ji plan to solve this then? forever closure?…

    Recommend

  • indian
    May 15, 2012 - 10:10AM

    1] No offence but I don’t like this guy. his look and facial expressions. He reminds me….
    2] His double speak about US. Just ask him his relation with US senator John kerry. More specificaly his son was working with john kerry.

    Recommend

  • Disco
    May 15, 2012 - 10:10AM

    SM. Qureshi, Sir, take a stand, we are with you. Let’s show the world what we Pakistanis are capable of under good leadership (PTI)

    Recommend

  • indian
    May 15, 2012 - 10:11AM

    If it is just politics then ignore my above comment. As as Indian we hate politics and politicians.

    Recommend

  • am
    May 15, 2012 - 10:13AM

    Since the govt is ready to sale everything for money,nation is looking towards opposition especially PTI.hopefully,people will stand by PTI’s stance against NATO supply and will not let govt sale nation’s pride.

    Recommend

  • Rana
    May 15, 2012 - 10:13AM

    NATO supplies were actively functioning for the last decade, and what did Shah Mehmood do about it in his tenure as foreign minister?

    Recommend

  • Observer's Eye
    May 15, 2012 - 10:15AM

    OMG Look who’s talking?

    Recommend

  • John B
    May 15, 2012 - 10:19AM

    If he understands the budget difficulties and international obligation, then why is he organizing nationwide agitation when the govt is trying to correct the mistakes?

    Surprising how his loyalty suddenly changed from PPP to PTI within two years.

    Recommend

  • AFPAK
    May 15, 2012 - 10:21AM

    “Can the DCC overrule the parliament?”

    Let me frame the real question, “Can the Parliament overrule the Deep Corps Commandors, the real DCC?

    Recommend

  • Polpot
    May 15, 2012 - 10:38AM

    “‘Govt must not restore NATO supply routes’”
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Once a FM always a FM!

    Recommend

  • Asad
    May 15, 2012 - 10:54AM

    Too late Mr. Qureshi

    Recommend

  • May 15, 2012 - 11:06AM

    @Rana:
    Qureshi is right. At that time there was no incidence which happened at Salala check post killing 24 soldiers. Besides, if you take a step, think before it, then stand by it. That is what he wants to say.

    Recommend

  • May 15, 2012 - 11:08AM

    @indian:
    lolzzz … if u r an indian then all is well. if a pakistani then remember kerry logger bill.

    Recommend

  • freehussaini
    May 15, 2012 - 11:12AM

    Poor guy! He is just frozen in Time.

    Recommend

  • freehussaini
    May 15, 2012 - 11:14AM

    Dear Mr. Shah Mehmood Qureshi! You are a peer. Do you confirm it or, deny it?

    Recommend

  • H.A. Khan
    May 15, 2012 - 11:15AM

    Good that he is not the Foreign Minister.

    Recommend

  • A real Bloch
    May 15, 2012 - 11:33AM

    Kill them this is the only solution

    Recommend

  • Ali
    May 15, 2012 - 11:35AM

    We must not open the supplies!!
    Wil anybody favour the opening of the route if his BROTHER, HUSBAND OR SON was amongst those killed in Salala?
    US is not sorry for the incident so all the more chances that it may do it again! Then, what we will do, close the supply again? How immature!

    Recommend

  • Ali
    May 15, 2012 - 11:36AM

    PTI’s clear stance is very much appreciated?
    Does PMLN have any stance on US? Can NS dare to speak against US?

    Recommend

  • Hashim Khan
    May 15, 2012 - 11:41AM

    Agreed, Government should not restore NATO supply, it can effect peace and stability of Pakistan.Recommend

  • Watty
    May 15, 2012 - 11:47AM

    It is incredible to witness the depths of hypocrisy that people can stoop to as demonstrated by SMQ since joining PTI. The SMQ who was dilly-dallying and dancing to the tunes of the US administration in his earlier avatar as PPP’s Foreign Minister must have all been a dream after-all.

    Recommend

  • Haris Chaudhry
    May 15, 2012 - 11:53AM

    This guy and the overall PTI mob wants to face the wrath of 46 NATO nations where 80% of our exports go and those that give 90% of our aid and balance of payments just so he could get elected. This is against our national security, welfare and an elitist pandering to the masses.
    HarisRecommend

  • Imran Con
    May 15, 2012 - 11:59AM

    @Disco:
    Pathetic. That implies the common Pakistanis are just brain-dead good-for-nothings without someone telling them how to live.

    Recommend

  • vasan
    May 15, 2012 - 12:08PM

    Mr Qureshi: The train has left the station.

    Recommend

  • curious
    May 15, 2012 - 12:15PM

    The thing is SMQ is not in power and he does not realise that Pakistan risks isolation from the international community if it does not open the supply routes. Pakistan has no choice.

    Recommend

  • Gilgiti-No voting right but Proud Pakistani
    May 15, 2012 - 12:22PM

    Mr. Shah is right if we accept this demand in its present circumstances then next time we can not defend over any national interest. At least we can raise some pressure and demand some (trade benefits, subsidies etc).Recommend

  • Noble Tufail
    May 15, 2012 - 12:23PM

    A better opposition is expected from you dear PTI. reactive drum beating without reasoning is the popular culture but from PTI the expectation is that some good quality foreign policy experts draw a logical PTI view point on international issues… not merely Shah Mehmood Qureshi thundering on loud speakers.

    Recommend

  • Hedgefunder
    May 15, 2012 - 12:29PM

    Qureshi, should know better, than making such statements !!! After all he was in charge of foreign ministry and should be well aware as to the leverage US/NATO have over Pakistan !!!!
    This goes to show as to what is to be expected from PTI, in event they take office ! Recommend

  • CaptainNemo
    May 15, 2012 - 12:30PM
  • Zeeshan Sheikh
    May 15, 2012 - 12:35PM

    Be ready for more pakistani casualities wheter it is our soldiers in a NATO freindly fire or civilian collateral damage by drones.

    Since we have so called ‘realist’ western worshippers.

    Recommend

  • Parvez
    May 15, 2012 - 12:55PM

    Playing politics with national issues is not a sign of maturity.

    Recommend

  • Noble Tufail
    May 15, 2012 - 12:59PM

    what about a PTI foreign policy summit … purely an academic discussion with representation of the best subject matter experts. and then take the nation on board.

    Recommend

  • Concerned
    May 15, 2012 - 1:06PM

    I donot think this man a former FM is a well-wisher of Pakistan but only making this statement to score some brownie points. PTI has become a khichdi with its top members pulling in different directions is unlikely to rule the country.

    Recommend

  • KM
    May 15, 2012 - 1:15PM

    Hope this does not happenRecommend

  • muaaz
    May 15, 2012 - 1:17PM

    i think its too late Mr Qureshi….Recommend

  • Jaipal dahiya
    May 15, 2012 - 1:23PM

    @feroze:well said.it is easy to raise such voices.had imran or nawaz in power they would have taken the same decesion.kayani gilan, and zardari have jointly taken wise decesion.those who r opposing r doing so for votes or r emotiomal .even mush cud not do that.

    Recommend

  • rafiq
    May 15, 2012 - 1:33PM

    @curious:
    whats the solution of suicide bombers then mate what have u got in ur mind…..Recommend

  • Ahmad Hassan
    May 15, 2012 - 1:42PM

    Despite the fact that I’m a huge PTI fan, I still don’t get how can someone think that NATO supply route can not be opened. Its like Pakistani opposition has no sense of international relations know-how whatsoever. We bluffed and the Americans called our bluff. Thank you very much.

    P.S. Please don’t think this whole game had anything to do with the civilian government. It has always been Army’s game and Army has blundered. Once again. I wonder why do we bother with these generals anyway. Recommend

  • Faraz
    May 15, 2012 - 1:43PM

    So glad to see sane Pakistanis commenting here. Otherwise you mostly see …those who live in denial ….talking of fake/non-existent honor/ghairat/conspiracy theories, RAW, FBI etc commenting here. NATO routes should be opened, have to be opened (we have no other option) and this PTI is another party with no real substance/stance on any of the real issues, only promoting anti-Americanism without much substance otherwise, playing with common man’s (and our over-zealous/emotional youth’s ) sentiments to get the vote bank. Recommend

  • Mohammad Ali Siddiqui
    May 15, 2012 - 1:47PM

    Pakistan is going to face serious repercurssions after supply of NATO routes. Recommend

  • Mandeep Vaid
    May 15, 2012 - 3:39PM

    @Ali:
    centuries long slavery of the despot mongols, centuries long slavery of the British!

    Pakistan came into existence on the 14 August 1947 and already on the 20 October 1947 Pakistani people had once again given themselves to slavery and chosen the United States of America as their new masters.

    Neither you were loyal slaves nor you have the format to be ever your own masters because you hate your roots and lack every “cultural authenticity of a Hindustani!”

    Recommend

  • Affi
    May 15, 2012 - 4:54PM

    @ Logic

    FACTS : SMQ was not sacked. He resigned as a matter of principle by not allowing RD diplomatic immunity :-)

    Recommend

  • Hammad
    May 15, 2012 - 5:45PM

    PTI will collect chandas from foreign countries to make us financially independent from NATO route revenues? Can somebody please tell these PTI ghairatmands that ghairat only suits when you have your bellies full?

    Recommend

  • Rana
    May 15, 2012 - 6:21PM

    @ Naeem Javid Muhammad:
    The supply routes were used to transport ammunition and artillery at the time too. Afghanistan was in state of war as much as it is now. Imran Khan opposed NATO routes at that time too but Shah Mehmood rather endorsed it. Noora Kushti I guess

    Recommend

  • A Pakistani
    May 16, 2012 - 6:59AM

    @Ahmad Hassan: Mr Ahmed ,what do you think of these politicians , can they decide about any thing which is in Pakistan’s national interests or in the interest of Pakistan’s national security . I think you must sit and recall those days when the Supply Routes were closed. Who all were trying to get the credit of such a daring action and stance . Were they the generals or some one else . I leave it to you to ponder upon and decide. Our politicians can not afford owning this decision of restoring the supply routes reason being the general elections in this or may be in the next year. Please think before you comment , so that you may not be reminded of the past again. Be sincere to yourself and to your country , if we do not get sincere with either of these two , we will not make any progress

    Recommend

  • May 16, 2012 - 1:41PM

    Nobody wants to reopen the NATO supplies but SMQ is showing his sympathy to the nation which he got after joining PTI,none of pakistani politicians are loyal with pakistan and nation but just to get more and more fame and money

    Recommend

  • Azim
    May 17, 2012 - 2:52AM

    I am surprised to see some comments, this on record is the only FM who decided to resist / resign on a national principle – US did not wanted him because of that nor did PPP leaders, as what he wanted was a solution to Raymond Davis case in-line with national interest.

    So, irrespective of history, this person stood for something many in power would never dare to do. What he is saying is also voice of our Pakistani hearts, so lets not challenge the idea, support if you can. Here its not PTI, PPP, or PML-N that is loosing face and dignity, we all are the victims – pakistan is loosing here, so please think as a pakistani and support else please STF-UP.

    Pakistan Zindabad.

    Recommend

More in Punjab