Karzai says NATO failed in Kabul, Taliban deny Haqqani involvement

Published: April 16, 2012

Although Haqqanis are part of Taliban, we did not ask for any help, guidance or support: Taliban spokesman. PHOTO: REUTERS

KABUL: Afghan President Hamid Karzai said on Monday that a coordinated Taliban attack on Kabul showed a “failure” by Afghan intelligence and especially by NATO, while Washington signalled the Haqqani group of militants was responsible.   

The Afghan leader’s comments underscored abiding divisions between the Afghan government and Washington, but if the role of the Haqqanis is confirmed, it could lead to fresh tensions in ties between the United States and Pakistan.

The Haqqanis, who are allied to the Taliban, are based in the border area between Afghanistan and Pakistan and analysts say Islamabad regards them as a strategic asset.

“We had received a great deal of intelligence that the Haqqanis were planning these kinds of attacks,” Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said at a news briefing.

In Kabul, battles that broke out at midday on Sunday gripped the city’s central districts through the night, with large explosions and gunfire lighting up alleys and streets. The fighting finally ended on Monday.

“The fact that terrorists were able to enter Kabul and other provinces was an intelligence failure for us and especially for NATO,” Karzai’s office said in a statement.

Though the death toll was relatively low considering the scale of the assault, it highlighted the ability of militants to strike high-profile targets in the heart of the city even after more than 10 years of war.

Karzai echoed his Western backers by praising Afghan security forces, saying they had proven their ability to defend their country – a task that will increasingly fall to them as foreign armies reduce their troop numbers in Afghanistan.

Defense Department spokesman George Little said the Pentagon did not believe there had been an intelligence failure.

“If we’re held to the standard to have to know precisely when and where each insurgent attack is going to occur, I think that’s an unfair standard,” he said. “This is a war zone.”

The attacks mark another election-year setback in Afghanistan for U.S. President Barack Obama, who wants to present the campaign against the Taliban as a success before the departure of most foreign combat troops by the end of 2014.

Karzai’s office said 36 insurgents were killed in the attacks, which paralyzed Kabul’s government district and also targeted three other provinces in what the Taliban called the start of a spring offensive. One fighter was captured.

Eleven members of Afghan security forces and four civilians were killed in the well-planned attacks in Kabul and the eastern Nangarhar, Logar and Paktia provinces, the government said.

The Taliban claimed sole responsibility for the attacks and said it had sent a 30-man suicide squad after two months of preparation.

“The attacks were very successful for us and were a remarkable achievement, dealing a psychological and political blow to foreigners and the government,” Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid told Reuters.

“Although the Haqqanis are part of the Taliban, we did not ask for any help, guidance or support. This is a baseless plot from the West, who wants to show that we are separate.”

ATTACKS ON PARLIAMENT, IN PROVINCES

Insurgents were killed attacking the Afghan parliament, and in a multi-story building under construction that they had occupied to fire rocket-propelled grenades and rifles down on the heavily fortified diplomatic enclave.

More were killed in Kabul’s east, and while attacking a NATO base in the eastern city of Jalalabad.

Fighting in the capital only ended with Special Forces assaults that were mounted as dawn broke.

Assisting physically for the first time in the attack, NATO helicopters launched strafing attacks on gunmen in the building site, which overlooked the NATO headquarters and several embassies, including the British and German missions.

Elite Afghan soldiers scaled scaffolding to outflank the insurgents, who took up defensive positions on the upper floor of the half-built structure. Bullets ricocheted off walls, sending up puffs of brick dust.

The assault, which began with attacks on embassies, a supermarket, a hotel and the parliament, was one of the most serious on the capital since U.S.-backed Afghan forces removed the Taliban from power in 2001.

“You asked what it means. It means we’re still in a fight,” General Martin Dempsey, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, said at the news briefing in Washington.

“We’ve got three more fighting seasons with which to both build the ANSF (Afghan National Security Forces) and diminish the capability of the Taliban,” he said, before most foreign troops leave by the end of 2014.

Despite signalling the Haqqanis were involved, both Panetta and Dempsey shied away from linking the attack to Pakistan, or the Pakistani government, as Dempsey’s predecessor, Mike Mullen, did after a similar attack last fall.

“We’re not prepared to suggest that this emanated out of Pakistan,” Dempsey said.

Mullen said after an attack on the U.S. Embassy in Kabul in September that the Haqqanis were responsible and acted as a “veritable arm” of Pakistani intelligence.

However, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton spoke to Pakistan’s foreign minister about their shared responsibility to confront militants following Sunday’s attacks in Afghanistan, the State Department said in a statement on Monday.

Clinton also discussed the “next steps in the US-Pakistani dialogue” following the conclusion of a Pakistani parliamentary review, State Department Victoria Nuland said.

Mujahid, the Taliban spokesman, said the assaults in Kabul and three eastern provinces marked the beginning of a new warm-weather fighting season.

“These attacks are the beginning of the spring offensive and we had planned them for months,” Mujahid told Reuters.

He said the onslaught was revenge for a series of incidents involving U.S. troops in Afghanistan – including the burning of copies of the Koran at a NATO base, and the massacre of 17 civilians by a U.S. soldier – and vowed there would be more.

The attacks came a month before a NATO summit at which the United States and its allies want to put the finishing touches to plans for the transition to Afghan security control, and days before a meeting of defense and foreign ministers in Brussels to prepare for the alliance summit in Chicago.

While Western forces are already handing off to the Afghan army, local forces have apparently failed to learn lessons from the similar assault in September, when insurgents took up a position in a tall building under construction to attack embassies and NATO offices below.

on Twitter, become a fan on Facebook

Reader Comments (14)

  • Apr 16, 2012 - 10:54PM

    they cant protect their so-called Green zone and criticizing us for jail break

    Recommend

  • Apr 16, 2012 - 11:37PM

    Karzai let us hear some more truths

    Recommend

  • Cautious
    Apr 16, 2012 - 11:38PM

    Oh well – Pakistan and Afghanistan share that much in common — never met a problem that they couldn’t blame on someone else.

    Recommend

  • Devin Leonard
    Apr 16, 2012 - 11:39PM

    This was hardly a US intelligence failure, Karazai is just acting schizophrenic as usual. The CIA has been saying for over a month that something like this was going to happen. If not for US air support the insurgents would have done far more damage. The US are the real heroes of this counter assault. Not the ANSF.

    Recommend

  • Feroze
    Apr 17, 2012 - 12:02AM

    @ devin Leonard To mount such an attack takes a lot of planning. For the USNatoisaf to have failed so miserably to detect this speaks volumes about their intelligence capability. Given all the resources they have at their disposal how pathetic is it that some thing like this happens. What a waste of lives and money this war has been for all involved especially Pakistan who has suffered in tms of both, casualties and economic devastation.

    Recommend

  • KiJ
    Apr 17, 2012 - 12:04AM

    @Devin Leonard:

    Really?

    Recommend

  • Mohammad Ali Siddiqui
    Apr 17, 2012 - 12:24AM

    If the NATO forces will continue to fail to deliver in Afghanistan, I am afraid that one fine morning, Afghanistan will go in the total control of Taliban and NATO forces will be surrendering their arms and ammunition before the Taliban forces.

    The future of Afghanistan is bleak. Unless the Taliban’s are not eliminated, the law and order situation will continue to go from bad to worse.

    Recommend

  • DB
    Apr 17, 2012 - 1:01AM

    @Devin Leonard:
    You have millions of dollars in active real time surveillance equipment just in Kabul than we have in all of Pakistan combined. Was it turned off during the attacks like our radars during May Abbottabad operation?

    I request a creation of an investigative commission to see if there is any collusion between CIA and Haqqanis. After all, they are previous and perhaps current allies.

    Recommend

  • Imran Mohammad
    Apr 17, 2012 - 1:19AM

    @Pakistan politics, Jail break is very very troubling, no matter if anyone criticizes it or not.

    Recommend

  • Apr 17, 2012 - 3:56AM

    Jail break in Pakistan or well planned attacks inside Kabul indicates that Taliban have a significant inside support. Without an active cooperation from inside it is just not possible to carry out such successful operations. Not an encouraging sign for peace and prosperity in this region. Taliban is on the rise, once the foreign forces leave Afghanistan Taliban are going to succeed. They have sensed it and want to negotiate with the US from a commanding position.Recommend

  • Bakir Mukeem
    Apr 17, 2012 - 8:18AM

    Do we really think talibans will sit with some one who is leaving the region and discuss their future in a country they are based in and successfully fought two super power for the last 3 decades?? Could some one enlighten me on this please?

    Recommend

  • MarkH
    Apr 17, 2012 - 9:17AM

    It’s just that time of the year where Karzai gets loud and then issues backtracking statements later.

    Recommend

  • syed
    Apr 17, 2012 - 1:35PM

    they were unable to prevent attack on their soil 9/11………….looosers

    Recommend

  • j. von hettlingen
    Apr 17, 2012 - 8:47PM

    The Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid who bragged about the success of the attacks last Sunday, did he speak on behalf of Mullah Omar of the Quetta Shura? It was alleged that Mullah Omar’s men don’t pretend that they could deliver peace either with the Haqqani Network or with the other strong insurgent group, the Hezb-e-Islami group of Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, who – like Jalaladin Haqqani – was another Jihad veteran against the Sovjet Red Army in the 1980′s and a protégé of Pakistan’s ISI.

    Recommend

More in World